Posted on 11/29/2017 10:14:40 AM PST by Kaslin
Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-NY) exhibited mounting frustration Wednesday with the inaction on Capitol Hill in light of the recent sexual allegations. She has called for the resignation of both Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) and Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and even walked out of the House Democrats’ morning conference meeting saying harassment wasn’t being addressed seriously. “I don’t have time for meetings that aren’t real,” she told reporters.
Rep. Kathleen Rice leaves House Dem meeting early, saying harassment wasn’t being addressed seriously. “I don’t have time for meetings that aren’t real.” pic.twitter.com/hoB6lAmBqX— Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) November 29, 2017
Rice asked House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) Wednesday to release one of Conyers’s accusers from her confidentiality agreement which was part of a $27,000 settlement in 2015.
Rice argues that since the accuser “attempted to seek help through a deeply flawed system” she “should not continue to be silenced by the institution that failed to protect her in the first place.”
“Under the settlement, the complainant was forced into a non-disclosure agreement and has been unable to openly discuss the workplace harassment and abuse she was subjected to,” Rep. Rice writes, “while Rep. Conyers and his attorney, Arnold Reed, have been free to make their case to the public.”
“Three additional women (Maria Reddick, Melanie Sloan, and Deanna Maher) have been able to speak publicly about harassment by Rep. Conyers because they chose not to pursue a complaint through a system that is now universally acknowledged to be stacked against the victim,” she added.
“Mr. Reed has made clear his client will not release the former employee from the agreement, and it is unclear whether the Office of Compliance, the House Ethics Committee, House Employment Counsel, or some combination of the three has the authority to do so,” Rice concludes. “As Speaker of the House, I urge you to immediately intervene to right this wrong. The woman named in the settlement agreement with Rep. Conyers deserves the opportunity to tell her story and I ask you to swiftly intercede on her behalf.”
Speaker Ryan and prominent GOP leaders held a press conference Wednesday addressing the issue of sexual harassment and announcing an upcoming vote on a resolution that requires mandatory training for members, staff, and interns on appropriate and inappropriate behavior.
"Sexual harassment has no place in any workplace -- let alone the United States Congress," Ryan said.
Finally a Democrap I agree with.
I'd like to see how far they can float that canard.
So, DemonRat...there’s a war on women? Just figured out which party is involved in this? You’re really smart, eh?
Yes, but will she include Hillary’s husband in her anti-harassment campaign?
I agree with her. Drain the swamp. Sex and exploitation of sex is part of how they maintain power. There’s probably been thousands of honey pot traps and thousands of people who see nothing wrong with taking advantage of their position and power.
Can the accuser consider the agreement void as it may have been signed under duress?
Hasn’t she understood WDC. She must start molesting and abusing her lessers immediately!!! Not to worry, the taxpayers apparently are stiffed for the payoffs to keep those molested quiet.
This has been a dream week! There’s blood in the water and sharks are in a feeding frenzy!
“Speaker Ryan and prominent GOP leaders held a press conference Wednesday addressing the issue of sexual harassment and announcing an upcoming vote on a resolution that requires mandatory training for members, staff, and interns on appropriate and inappropriate behavior.”
Yeah, that’s the ticket, more bull$hit obfuscation! These men don’t need any training, they have abusing women down pat already. Ryan is such an unremitting POS.
I'm not sure Ryan would have the authority to release a third party from a confidentiality agreement that Ryan was not even a party to. He certainly would not under basic contract law but I don't know if there is any type of Federal statute which could deal with this.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Fake meeting? Who would of guessed...
The whole training thing makes me scratch my head.
I think I had the “keep your hands to yourself” and “that is not the way decent people act in public” behaviors down by the time I was six. With a few lapses during middle school.
He can't even fathom the speed at which this stuff is unraveling. There is no way for him to get ahead of the curve on this one.
The term "overtaken by events" suits him to a T.
You wanna really pi$$ ‘em off Kathleen? Change parties.
He should just say screw it, and release it. Even the most liberal judge would not oppose this.
Hey, come on over to the Republican side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.