Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charles Manson Was an Evolutionist
Creation Evolution Headlines ^ | November 22, 2017 | David F. Coppedge

Posted on 11/22/2017 6:48:29 AM PST by fishtank

November 22, 2017 | David F. Coppedge

Charles Manson Was an Evolutionist

Few Darwinians would condone murder, of course, but the Manson case shows what can happen to someone who puts their faith in the teachings of Darwin and his disciples.

Well, after 45 years in prison for the heinous murders he instigated, Charles Manson has finally met his Maker. Many in the public have held a kind of horrified fascination for the cult hero whose “Manson family” shocked the world in 1969 with some of the bloodiest, cruelist, most senseless murders known up to that time. How many who have followed the case, though, realize that the motivations for his murderous rampage included the teachings of Nietzsche, a fervent disciple of Darwin? Even conservative news reports often overlook that point (example on WND). Jerry Bergman (a CEH contributor) connects the dots in his book, How Darwinism Corrupts Morality.

(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creation; darwin; manson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: fishtank

Poor Lamarck. He got sloppy seconds but he was right too! Epigenetics has proven his theory.

As for Manson, the only thing interesting about him ever is how a mechant amoral evil loser can have enough artificial charisma to influence others to do evil with and for him. A sociological point of study. Otherwise, there is no point to that speck of shit. Glad he’s done.


41 posted on 11/22/2017 9:19:56 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venkman


42 posted on 11/22/2017 9:19:56 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Oh for God’s sake. He also liked the color Blue. What do you make of that????


43 posted on 11/22/2017 9:58:38 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

You mad bro? lol


44 posted on 11/22/2017 10:06:12 AM PST by Venkman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Science was corrupted a LONG time ago. We have anti-science now where men can turn into women (lies) and they use such irrational words like “transgender” when no such thing can exist. Also, babies in the womb are not human and can be killed in today’s “scientism” (yes, it is a religion now). LOL Got to have “faith” in science when in my philosophy of science class, the prof stated there is no “Truth” with a capital “T” in science. There only is observation and facts-—which don’t exist anymore.

Words have been destroyed and co-opted. Words like marriage and Social Justice are meaningless, so science is meaningless and 3 + 2 =6 or 9 in the postmodernist (Marxist utopia)-—so now they can control the emotions of the masses which is a rejection of Reason.

The Marxists don’t believe in Natural Law (which is where science is derived). Without Designer, there is no Design in Nature. There is no mathematics. Newton was a Natural philsopher and would have been called a scientist in his day if the word existed. Now, Newton would be banned from universities, because he believes in Objective Truth (God) and, of course, Natural Laws—laws of nature and nature’s God. Faith is essential in ALL areas of LIFE and Science-—it is essential to mankind...but some “faith” is a LOT more RATIONAL than other faiths—like scientism (which is an ejection of Natural Laws and God’s Laws.)

Ask Solzhenitsyn’s friend who was a “scientist” in communist country—forget his name but read his book years ago. There can be no Truth (God) in science-—so they can’t DO “science”. All our government universities are totally controlled by Marxists today.


45 posted on 11/22/2017 10:22:46 AM PST by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ping jockey

I totally understand. But it is essential to know why such evil people are “created”—because they are shaped and molded by evil people who never gave them protection and love, so their soul was literally destroyed. They are incapable of being human because they never experienced love and trust in early childhood; they are incapable of those feelings.

Parents need to understand child psychology, Piaget and Erikson, now, because Common Sense has been eliminated because of TV, Hollyweird, and the destruction of the Natural Family and end of extended families, and tradition. The Cultural Marxists who intend to destroy civilization, and therefore corrupt all the children, know exactly how to create insanity and confusion and immorality in little children so they “think” just like a Manson. Common Core is filled with that psychological warfare on little minds, and it is even embedded into math now.


46 posted on 11/22/2017 10:42:47 AM PST by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

“I think this post is trying to say that because Charles Manson was a bad person, and he was an evolutionist, that, therefore, evolution is wrong.

Which is a logical fallacy.”

Where does the post say that? Otherwise you’re just making a straw man argument.

Which is a logical fallacy.


47 posted on 11/22/2017 10:54:27 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

” All evolutionists are insane.

This is clearly malformed, faulty logic”

I agree, but since YOU made that statement, and not the author, it is YOUR faulty logic, not his. If you know it’s faulty, why bother posting it? Seems silly.


48 posted on 11/22/2017 11:03:57 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Your beef is still with crooked politicians. The areas of science corrupted by them are small compared to the entire discipline.


49 posted on 11/22/2017 11:11:47 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ping jockey

I’m an evolutionist, too. Haven’t killed anyone lately, though.


50 posted on 11/22/2017 11:30:20 AM PST by sparklite2 (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Manson was an example of what happens when you believe, as progressives do today, that everything is ok. Sex, drugs, lying...no problem carey on.


51 posted on 11/22/2017 11:52:43 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag (If GOP won House, Senate and Presidency...why are the Democrats still in charge?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

No. The beef is God v. Man. Truth v. Lies. (There is no “Truth” without God as Dostoevsky noted).

Fundamentally, in Universities, etc., science has ejected God, so “science” has become “scientism” which is a dogmatic, irrational man-made-up religion.

Is “real science” practiced-—very rarely and by a few God-centered men. But like Hawking, the godless make the most irrational claims like “philosophy is dead” or there are multi-universes—all as irrational as any religion. Hawking goes outside his field to make claims, being a political animal, so, these so-called “scientists” can’t help saying irrational things or making irrational claims like any religion-—since they also are “political animals”.

As Aristotle stated EVERYONE is a political animal—even so-called “scientists”. Can’t separate your Faith from Reason, as Thomas Aquinas noted, but you think real scientists can separate Faith from Reason.

Never possible. Always assumptions in EVERYTHING. Science always has “faith” attached to it. People ALL have biases and it is too easy to corrupt everything, like the peer-reviewed articles on vaccinations with Big Pharma paying for all the “research” results and Thompson, the whistleblower, stating all studies that proved their “results” wrong were destroyed. (Not very good science, huh?)

Study the light bulb which has been on for over 100 years in California-—there is some great “science” when Christianity was the dominate worldview and taught in all the public schools. Now godless Big Pharma and corporations control all the “research” etc. and evil, diabolical people, so there is no real science at all anymore. Just AI diabolical evil ideas now, like bio-engineered plagues-—like sex robots-=pills to mutilate and destroy the body’s functions. Using the real science for “evil” is godless and nihilism. Only the Christian Worldview created the Age of Reason and Modern Science as a result of Natural Law (God’s Laws of the Universe). We are drifting away from Truth-—to the abyss and WWIII because of “scientism” (no real science, just satanism and evil).


52 posted on 11/22/2017 12:35:13 PM PST by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

“I’m an evolutionist, too. Haven’t killed anyone lately, though.”

That only proves two things:

(1) You have a conscience.

(2) You are inconsistent.

A true Darwinist would exterminate weaker organisms.


53 posted on 11/22/2017 2:18:00 PM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

A true Darwinist would exterminate weaker organisms.


No, that be a proponent of Social Darwinism, which was the failed attempt to translate nature’s being red in tooth and claw to human society. Nature does the exterminating in Darwinian natural selection, not you or me.


54 posted on 11/22/2017 2:34:33 PM PST by sparklite2 (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
"Charles Manson Was an Evolutionist"

Did he have a working knowledge of geography too?

55 posted on 11/22/2017 2:51:34 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

If I say that “I think this post is trying to say ___ “ then I am not representing what he said, but rather representing what I understand.
In which case I not making a straw man argument.


56 posted on 11/22/2017 8:27:45 PM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: coloradan

“If I say that “I think this post is trying to say ___ “ then I am not representing what he said, but rather representing what I understand.”

So, you assume the argument to be fallacious and dismiss it, rather than consider that, because you assumption makes the argument fallacious, your assumption may be wrong?

Either way, you are the one introducing the fallacy.


58 posted on 11/27/2017 10:18:49 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Truth and common sense matter nothing to a Darwinist.


59 posted on 12/02/2017 11:21:15 AM PST by alstewartfan (If you should leave me now A sudden wind will blow your mansion down. Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson