Posted on 11/14/2017 10:41:48 AM PST by scooby321
Known for his insightful take on politics, journalist and author Thomas Wictor believes Judge Roy Moore’s signature in Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson’s yearbook is a forgery.
The sevens in 1977 to the right of “Christmas,” are very different from the sevens in the date (12-22-77) above “Old Hickory House.” “Look at the two versions of the number “7,” tweeted Wictor.
“”12-22-77” and “Olde Hickory House” were written by a different person,” he added.
Next, Wictor points out “the “R” and “y” in “Roy,”” are not written the same way.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Lmao. It is so obvious she added stuff to “prove” he was there.
“I’m not so sure at all. The word “Roy” and the word “Moore” are different colored ink. It appears someone named “Roy” signed her yearbook and the the words “Moore, DA” were added later.”
It doesn’t look like that in other shots of the page, though. There is background shading related to the photo that ends towards the edge of the page. The writing crosses this border area.
The location was written as "Olde Hickory House". The real name was "Old Hickory House".
And this was supposedly written either by Moore, who supposedly ate there regularly, or the woman, who actually worked there.
Strange that whoever wrote that got the name wrong. Of course, if that was written 40 years after the fact...
The date and the restaurant name look like female handwriting - I know a lot of women who print with a very similar look (large, blocky). The numbers in the inscription vs. the ones under Moore’s signature do not match. The “e” is very distinctive in ‘Olde’ - again, I think a woman wrote it.
IMO, somebody added the date/restaurant name to try to pin Moore to a particular time/place to coincide with the accuser.
Lmao. It is so obvious she added stuff to “prove” he was there.
Exactly! That’s the trouble with most liars. They add too much specificity. The reality is people don’t remember details, exact times, etc. for events. Liars always add in lost of details in an attempt to make the lie seem more “real”.
We would be willing for an outside party to examine the yearbook, but it was stolen last night from my client's car.
The year book came out at Christmas— Never!! Did not happen. Easy to check. Did you see that bitch fake crying with her paid lawyer there on her paid New York City trip? I have never seen such phony theatrics in my life. I actually laughed out loud.
This is a slanderous lie. These malicious lies are not exemt from libel damage recovery. The Suit is now in preparation. It will cost millions but will be fun to watch. This rush to judgement is exposing many to horrible future embarrassment.
I remember people finding thousands of errors in Obama’s birth certificate and nothing happened.
Actually, my 1970 GM with power locks locked all the doors with one switch on the driver door. It’s power windows that didn’t have a single switch to control them all at once.
I was just going to say; If you’re going to lie, keep it simple. If you start getting elaborate, forging evidence, and giving specific details, you better be very good at what you do.
Cars did NOT have lock buttons that lock all the doors from the driver’s side until the early eighties
Some did.
Most didn't.
Establishing intent is easier given that the obviously added last name of Moore is a very bad attempt to forge the script Moore uses to write his name
This is not some innocent annotation to memorialize who wrote the message, it’s an outright attempt to forge Moore’s signature by duplicating public examples of his signature found on court documents
Nothing at all innocent or legit
Just going by what Rush had on his show a little while ago...
It looks like two different colored inks to me too.
I don’t know of any schools that get yearbooks in December?
Yes, that was my impression too: a woman’s handwriting. The loopy 2 with a stunted base stroke is feminine (or femmy). In short, a woman added identifying information after the signature — for what reason? Innocent? Guilty? Could be either. Or the whole thing could be fake.
From Wikipedia:
Child safety locks are built into the rear doors of most cars to prevent rear seat passengers from opening the doors both during transit and while the vehicle is stationary; vehicles have been built with this feature since the early 1980s. They provide the vehicle driver with a simple, safe & secure method to prevent unauthorized exit from the car. Although called a child lock it is equally effective for adult passengers.
Maybe she carried her yearbook around with her all year long. Or maybe not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
