Posted on 11/09/2017 10:44:10 AM PST by mojito
....On April 29, 2016, when the DNC became aware its servers had been penetrated, an emergency meeting was held between the Chairwoman of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, DNC’s Chief Executive, Amy Dacey, the DNC’s Technology Director, Andrew Brown, and Michael Sussman, a lawyer for Perkins Coie, a Washington, DC law firm that represented the DNC. Sussman took control of the meeting, setting out the DNC’s agenda when it came to dealing with the cyber attack on its server. The three most important questions, Sussman declared, were what data was accessed, how was it done, and how can it be stopped? The one question Sussman, a former federal prosecutor who focused on computer crimes, did not ask was, who did it?
It took the DNC four days to decide to bring in an outside vendor to investigate the breach of its servers. In the end, it was Sussman who made the call to...CrowdStrike. The call was made on May 4; by May 5 CrowdStrike had installed its FalconHost software that had triggered the Russian attribution.
[....]
For more than 30 days CrowdStrike had exclusive control over the DNC server. During this time, CrowdStrike made an attribution of Russian involvement that has been shown to be fundamentally flawed, and oversaw the transfer of politically sensitive documents, some of which may have been tainted by CrowdStrike’s own actions, to parties who subsequently leaked this material in a politically impactful manner....The data that would shed important light into the most significant claims of Russian involvement in the 2016 US Presidential election...remains out of the hands of those conducting the investigation.
It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that CrowdStrike, by irresponsibly and deliberately attributing the DNC cyber attack to Russia, is involved in deception on a scale that is hard to measure.
(Excerpt) Read more at medium.com ...
The point of going into Iraq was that we had no intel because Iraq threw the inspectors out.
And Iraq had failed to present a verifiable dossier as was a condition of the cease fire.
And Iraq had failed to return some 903 Prisoners of War from their invasion of Kuwait as required by the cease fire and were allowed to get away with that by 2 presidents while they languished and some died.
And Iraq was outsourcing its programs to Syria and Libya.
Go back and check my timeline.
Burger King.
Scott Ritter is also an unapologetic internationalist and he does not believe in US sovereignity. He believes the UN is the higher law.
Squirrel...doesn’t pertain to Ritter but I must have missed the heavy news coverage of Cuba being in the smuggled military aircraft rehab business for the Norks:
Ritter used to appear at ANSWER rallies to call for Bush’s impeachment. ANSWER is Ramsey Clarke’s group and WWP walks lockstep with it- both have demonstrated in support of North Korea.
Good point. Also, at that time ANSWER’s Iraq policy mirrored that of Russia, China, the EU, and the UN, all embroiled in Oil-for-Food.
I don’t know what his game is, but he has a history of playing games.
Oops! My apologies to McDonald’s.
Oops! My apologies to McDonald’s.
Legacy Press Smears VIPS Report After CIA Director Meets With Bill Binney
#16. My son’s unit, 299th Army Engineers MRB, found new Soviet bloc chemical suits during patrolling operations east of Hindaya (on the east bank of the Euphrates River whose bridge they helped capture on 4/03/2002). After conducting Ribbon Bridge construction/similar to pontoons, for lighter vehicles, 299th soldiers went out and captured hundreds of surrendering regular Iraqi soldiers as well as to find and mark Iraqi weapons bunkers.
Found this tonight while looking at old files for a book I’m working on.
“Herald Sun” (Herald and Weekly Times”,1/27/03, “Poison warfare suits found in mosque raid”, by Leo Schlink in London (Australian paper - www.heraldsun.ews.com.au.
“British police investigating a terror plot by Islamic saboteurs have found chemical warfare protection suits in a north London mosque.
The discovery has shocked detectives, who believe the find confirms supporters of Osama Bin Land were planning a poison attack on civilian targets in Britain.
Scotland Yard and MI5 detectives had kept the discover of the nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) suits secret.”
...
“The Finsbury Park mosque has a notorious reputation because of its use by radical Mulsim clerical Abu Hamza to preach holy war against Britain and the U.S.”
Do I detect a trend here folks?
#32. Did you notice a “smiley face” (intentional or accidental) in the name of the state registrar - first name ALVIN. Look at the “A” in the enlarged segment of the CLB.
Am I seeing things or what? Comments welcomed. Cash won’t hurt either.
#51. Date correction. It was 4/03/2003, not 2002.
Would re-use of the ribbon account for the differences?
Would re-use of the ribbon (normal in those typewriters) account for the differences?
After the way the MSM had such a snit of righteous indignation that Trump would dare publicly question the intel community’s findings of Russia being the alleged origin of the alleged hack, they ought to be wearing sack cloth and ashes, but it’ll never happen. I’m betting it was Seth Rich leaking, and the DNC covering it up by faking a hack with the help of CrowdFart.
Even with my somewhat limited knowledge and experience w/ Photoshop and photo/document editting.. I was ~99% certain that both Obama Birth Certificates were indeed forgeries. The public should be aware and reminded of this fact.
Unfortunately, I doubt anything will be done about it. His Real birth certificate is in a vault on the moon. :)
My mistake, his wife, Marina, is from Georgia, not Ukraine, and according to Ritter the US government was at one time concerned he was a spy for Israel and was concerned she was KGB..
A thing I didn’t know... he says Gen. Schwarzkopf at some point had him arrested. Doesn’t say why.
However the server was hacked, there is still the little detail that the information thus made public was information that the Democrats desperately needed to keep out of the public eye. Not because it contained confidential operational details, but because it contained evidence of massive fraud by the Democrats. They don’t want their corruption to be made public... not that their voter base cares.
A survey of the characters throughout this document does not manifest that such great variations of the text or font arise because of the ribbon.
Some Obots have shown somewhat dramatic character variations by resampling the text at varying, lower resolutions, but in those forays, differing resolution is cleary the operative alternation by virtue of their resized samplings, which says nothing about a single, high resolution capture at a resolution entirely sufficiently finely resolved to capture all of the more subtle differences as we see here. Their claims are not the case here, as this is one high resolution extraction (provided by BHO's supporters if not employees)--the single, highest resolution extraction (version of the document) known to exist, not a selection of varying-resolution extractions or resamplings.
Similarly for the 's', a different portion of ribbon would not account for any of the major differences we see in this case. There would not be anything in a ribbon to account for either a rectangularizion of the upper right in the one 's' while yielding a rounded upper right portion of the other. The same is valid for the lower-left curling back on itself, then all of a sudden not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.