Posted on 11/02/2017 10:56:35 AM PDT by ItsOnlyDaryl
The New York Times claimed there was no single reason for Sayfullo Saipovs decision to drive a truck into more than 20 people in New York City Tuesday.
TheNYT attributed his attack more to a lack of opportunity and financial trouble in a Wednesday profile of the terrorist, even though Saipov yelled Allahu Akbar while being apprehended by police and had a note pledging allegiance to the Islamic State.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
It is pure islam. Pure and simple. The real deal. Cut the PC "radical" crap.
1. Islam
He did it for social justice.. He and his brothers have been oppressed..
He should have parked outside the NYT Building and waited for their Employees to get off work.
Actually, he wouldn’t actually do that because he knows who his Friends are.
islamic jihad.
I’m not sure why the NYT or anyone that works for it exists.
- He came from a family
who practiced traditional islam and never embraced extremism.
How is that possible? What version of the Koran is used in that context? Anyone?
- As with any attack like this, there is no single reason
To say, where one or two or more perps kill innocents and declare doing so in the name of Allah, there is no religious motivation or purpose is to intentionally mislead and befuddle. For what purpose? (In this regard see my new tagline.)
It is amazing that the NYT can publish such articles and yet sell ad space.
Wow thanks Mister lying liberal scumbag we would have thought it was caused by sharia law or something and of course that would have been wrong. Everybody knows the muslim animal attacked innocent people because of Trump’s tax cuts or something right?
The Newspaper of Idiots.
Some statements are so stupid only a reader of the New York Times would believe them. With apologies to George Orwell.
I’m advocating for truck control tomorrow.
5.56mm
That was pretty good.
5.56mm
“TheNYT attributed his attack more to a lack of opportunity and financial trouble “
I always shout “Allah Akbar!” when I’m broke. Doesn’t everybody?
If there was no reason for it, then everything is ok.
Why do leftists defend Islamic murderers?
Are the readers of the NYT this stupid? Really?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.