Sure hope not...
You don’t say............................
I heard the opposite.
<< Stanford University study >>
No shortage of student volunteers for this study, I reckon.
Sure hope not...
Next study: What is the relationship between the sun and periods of light and darkness? Price tag $1,000,000.
I’m shocked, I tell you shocked!
Combine it with Cialis or Viagra for both partners for a better pharmaceutical outcome.
Like WOW man!
I’d say the cause is more likely who you hang with...people that are a little looser.
As I live ‘n’ breathe ain’t it a wonderment how these here kollege kids come up with all this here knowledge ‘n’ smart stuff from all that readin’ ‘n’ writtin’ and fancy book learnin’. So smoking the old whacky weed makes ya hornier then a three balled cat, huh? I’d a never guessed it....
Robin Williams, comedian on “Weed”:
“These drugs have side effects that go on for seven days, like [the] tendency to grow another head. When we were growing up, we knew the side effects of the drugs we were taking. Cocaine, side effects were paranoia and ninjas on the lawn. I remember that. Quaaludes, side effects were talking in tongues, English as a second language. I remember that. Marijuana, side effects were laughter, Frosted Flakes. That’s all I remember.”
And this: “They said that marijuana was a ‘performance-enhancing drug.’ Marijuana enhances many things — colors, tastes, sensations, but you are certainly not (f’ing) empowered. When you’re stoned, you’re lucky if you can find your own g-d’d feet. The only way it’s a performance-enhancing drug is if there’s a big (f’ing) Hershey bar at the end of the run.”
Performance wise— difficult for a “study” to assess since users vs. placebo group would notably be uh, forgetful. Best for both parties to “toke up” so both can forget later. Like “Sunday Morning Coming Down”. Cocaine —Williams called Peruvian marching powder.
Brilliant! You’ve got to get up pretty early in the morning to beat these Stanford Researchers.
There appears to be no limits to what the Stanford can discover!
I’ll just bet this research was taxpayer funded.
I am confident that there is some major causal density at work here.
Correlation is not causation, people.
That logic would make booze the number one aphrodisiac.
Another “no shit Sherlock” study.
Did the researchers factor in that sex is how women pay for their marijuana?
They just don’t remember how much sex they actually had.