Skip to comments.
NYT isn’t really Der Sturmer, but…
INN ^
| 10/22/17 22:59
| Jack Engelhard
Posted on 10/23/2017 6:49:40 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Charles Blow writes a regular column for The New York Times. Julius Streicher wrote a regular column for Der Sturmer. Therefore, Charles Blow is Julius Streicher.
Are you following this logic? Neither am I. But it is the rationale that Charles Blow uses to argue that Trump is Hitler. I am not kidding
and Blow is his real name
and truly he does write op-eds for The New York Times
and The New York Times is indeed Der Sturmer, a proposition well get to in a moment.
Well get to it once we follow Blows stream of thought, and how he manages to mention Trump and Hitler in the same breath. Blows most recent column comes with this headline Trump isnt really Hitler, but the lying
So that is Blows connection. Hitler lied. Trump lies. So they are the same. How does Trump lie? For that, Blow offers two main sources, CNN and MSNBC [
]
Im not saying that The New York Times is quite the same, but
Mainly five points.
- The New York Times is openly hostile to Israel and uses propaganda masked as news to threaten Jews everywhere. Shades of Der Sturmer.
- The New York Times is an advocate for only one party, the Democrat party, which mirrors Der Sturmer and its singular devotion to the Nazi party.
- The paper makes no pretense of being objective. The Times is in business to tell only one side of the story.
- Reporters must always be Liberals in thought and action
Obama-fearing men and women, plus Clinton cover-up artists.
- Editorialists must always slant their opinions to be furiously provocative against Israel, against the United States, against Republicans and against Donald Trump, no matter how reckless and ridiculous it makes them sound.
Which does not necessarily mean that Charles Blow is all that, but
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Israel; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: charlesblow; dersturmer; nyslimes; rop
1
posted on
10/23/2017 6:49:40 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
More like Volkischer Beobachter.
2
posted on
10/23/2017 6:50:58 AM PDT
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: Olog-hai
3
posted on
10/23/2017 6:52:13 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Olog-hai
To paraphrase JFK “A combination of Italian efficiency and German charm.”
4
posted on
10/23/2017 6:52:24 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: Olog-hai
We’ve always been at war with Eastasia, Winston................
5
posted on
10/23/2017 6:54:19 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
To: Olog-hai
Actually, if one would take an article from
Der Sturmer and replace the word "Jews" with "white male", the result would be indistinguishable from some of the screeds in the NYT and other leftist newspapers.
(And by "leftist newspapers" I mean almost all newspapers.)
6
posted on
10/23/2017 7:25:27 AM PDT
by
sima_yi
( Reporting live from the far North)
To: Olog-hai
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Or Goebbel's Der Angriff ("The Attack")
8
posted on
10/23/2017 7:47:18 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
To: Olog-hai
Julius Streicher ............................... He was the guy who yelled Heil Hitler all the way to the gallows. Now that’s what I would call real dedication to his leader. I guess Blow is dedicated to Hitllery Clinton?
9
posted on
10/23/2017 8:28:27 AM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
(Damn, the tag line disappeared again? Coursors!)
To: Olog-hai
Charles Blow is execreable.
10
posted on
10/23/2017 9:24:00 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(I am His and He is Mine)
To: sauropod; All
Isn't the Times owned by Jews? Then why is it anti-Israel?
ff
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
12
posted on
10/25/2017 7:32:29 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Yeah. Der Strumer had better artists. It gave one a lift to read about how der Juden were just about to take over the world, even if Hitler was the only hope to foil them. NY Times, not so much.
13
posted on
10/25/2017 7:38:37 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: foreverfree
Isn't the Times owned by Jews? Then why is it anti-Israel?No. Actually they're publicly traded. They do employ Jews. Their chairman and publisher is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. who is an Episcopalian, as was his mother. His dad was Jewish, later converted to Episcopalian according to some sources. His grandfather was a Reform Jew who, in the 1930s was strongly opposed to Zionism and the establishment of a Jewish State. Short article, New York Times Column on Anti-Zionism a Reminder of its Own Publishers Past
14
posted on
10/25/2017 7:43:11 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson