Ginsburg even let her hand show on marriage when she said, before the Obergefell ruling, that she believed the U.S. was "ready" for "gay marriage." What a propagandist.
Lawfare
NUTS!
only LIBS are allowed to speak to LIBS?
I was at a Catholic conference at which Justice Scalia spoke.
These cry babies are getting out of hand.
Likely because they are often rewarded for their fake outrage.
I was quite nervous about Gorsuch but he sure is tweaking all the right libs. LOL.
“Free Speech for Me but not for THEE! So, just SHUT UP, you far right Nazi!”
FSFP can go GFY.
These people are pathetic.
Sore loser soros probably funds Free Speech for People.
Eventually, soros the satanist will lose all his money via his short sales against the booming US economy and his reckless spending in self-destructive political movements.
Not a peep for anything Ginsberg has done???
Crickets
“Free Speech For People”
They have to change the name to “Free Speech for Liberals and throw conservatives in jail.”
By who?
A supreme court judge should be heard.
Why would he need to be punished?
He wasn’t making money off it, or offering to take a position in exchange...
Gorsuch should just argue that for the purposes of the ethics rules, it wasn’t a speech. For the purposes of the audience, it was a speech. Roberts understands that sort of logic.
There is no provision for the Chief Justice to reprimand one of associates. I suppose that he could if he decided to but that associate justice could just as easily turn around and reprimand the CJ.
Nothing happens.
If you want to lay the wood to a SCJ, you have one path. Impeach them.
Speaking at a facility partially owned by the president probably wont get that one done.
I vote for the same punishment he gave RBG when she interjected herself in the election
Let me guess, free speech for people believes in taxing people’s speech to be their opinion maker!
Isnt it what antifa advocates accross the board?
Is he going to take away his Supreme Court private gym membership ? Make him pay for his own haircuts ? What.
“Seems Free Speech For People only believe in free speech for themselves.”
I kind of agree if there is a case at hand before him. but honestly this rule seems only to apply to republican appointiees.
The reality is as the Federal employees have proven time and time again, the U.S. ‘supreme court’ is nothing more than a lawless group of dictators deciding innocence or guilt upon an ideological not legal basis.
There is as the other 2 branches has conceded over the last 100 years nothing to stop the 3rd branch and hold them to the Constitution. They have made themselves above the law in every practical sence by proclaiming themselves to have the first and last word on the Constitution on a case by case basis.
Even their supposed reliance upon cases being brought before them is a face in an ideologically diverse country of 300 million people.