Posted on 10/10/2017 11:28:17 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
Anal orifice. Traitor, communist, America-hater, criminal.
Most Americans will never know just how thoroughly and how deeply that evil man damaged the national security of these United States.
Let me get this straight, we are still using 70 year old B52s with no retirement in sight. So why can’t we update the Ticonderoga class like we did with the Iowa class battleships?
Everywhere you look, swamps needing draining and filling!
Thanks, Obastard! Eight long years to do something about this, but, no -- he had basketball brackets to fill out, had to say the "police acted stupidly," and had beer summits.
Yikes...a smiling traitor.
Ship hulls simply wear out with use. Use a metal warship long enough and you will find the hull is paper thin and barely keeps out water.
The Navy is refurbishing half of the remaining 22 Ticonderogas, enough to protect a planned eleven aircraft carriers into the 2030s. But the other eleven ships will start to age out in 2020.
And why aren't we refurbishing ALL of them?
I wonder if Barack HUSSEIN 0bama has an answer to that question.
Meanwhile, no one has lifted a finger to bring us that 355 ship Navy Trump promised in his campaign or to repeal sequester. More empty promises to repair the damage of the military hating Obamaites.
Why? Is that an “order”? And if so by whom?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia-class_cruiser
Been going on since the 90’s. Clinton scrapped the Virginia CGN’s long before they were due.
An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2017 Shipbuilding Plan
Kind of a BS headline. There’s no replacement in sight because they’re reducing the fleet. We’re still going to have 11 full carrier groups, with no serious naval enemy on our list. Now the platform is aging and probably needs to be replace, but that’s got nothing to do with retiring vessels that no longer fit into our vision or needs.
>>Let me get this straight, we are still using 70 year old B52s with no retirement in sight. So why can’t we update the Ticonderoga class like we did with the Iowa class battleships?
I agree. I served on an old nuclear submarine that would have random electrical fires when we were in warm water and pipes would just blow apart at test depth. It needed decommissioning.
But a surface ship doesn’t have the same concerns as a submarine and if it isn’t bursting into flames all the time, it should be upgradable.
“Most Americans will never know just how thoroughly and how deeply that evil man damaged the national security of these United States.”
He was never held accountable for his abuse of the “Bully Pulpit” which led to the murderzs (20?) of non blacks by black gangs beginning with the Zimmerman trial aftermath.
Everybody knows of Trayvon Martin but no one knows of the Melbourne Australian champion runner Christopher Lane here on a college scholarship from Duncan Oklahoma shot and killed while running down a Duncan street by members of the Crypts because of Obama’s “son” who was killed in “cold blood”..
I was involved in the development of the Navy LCS and it was a mess. They kept changing the specifications and broadening the mission in order to keep the funding. They had numerous committees working on the design and engineering changes were coming so fast that the drawings couldn’t even keep up with them. In the end they developed a ship that couldn’t really do a single mission well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.