Posted on 10/06/2017 12:26:09 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
It turns out those who vehemently demand Christians be tolerant of their views and lifestyles, and force Christians to perform services under threat of legal retaliation are — and I can’t believe I’m writing this — intolerant of Christians, and refuse to provide services for them.
In a recently released video from the group Abolish Human Abortion, a pro-life advocacy group, a gay coffee shop owner can be seen berating, insulting, and forcing the removal of the Christian group because of their beliefs.
Caytie Davis and her fellows had been handing out pro-life pamphlets that targeted the homosexual community for the spread of the Gospel. I won’t pretend that the pamphlet’s designs and words were fully geared for opening up discussion with the gay community without agitation first — you can check out the pamphlet for yourself at The Liberator — but the pamphlet’s blunt message aside, the group did not bring it into the coffee shop with them.
Davis and her fellow activists, seeking to relax after handing out pamphlets, went into Seattle’s Bedlam coffee shop. According to Davis, they didn’t engage anyone, or — as previously said — bring any of their literature into the shop with them. They got their coffee, and went upstairs into the lounge area to relax.
Only minutes later, the owner of the coffee shop burst into the room and demanded they leave.
The video shows the Christian group attempting to reason with the coffee shop owner, but to no avail. In fact, it only seemed to make him angrier according to The Liberator, and soon the owner :
{..snip..}
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
> Homosexuals did run the violent enforcement wing of the Nazi party until Hitler had them executed, not for being gay, but because their policies were too extreme.
Not entirely accurate. There were two gay factions in pre-WWII Berlin: the effeminate gays as exemplified by Magnus Hirschfeld, and the violent macho gays, who were rampant in the NAZI Party leadership. The problem for the NAZIs was that Hirshfeld, as was not unusual among gays, knew too much about the studly boys. His institute was raided and his library burned in the famous ‘NAZI book burning’ incident. Hitler’s studly fags were trying to get rid of the evidence.
Rohm and crew were shed later, and for the same reasons: he knew too much.
That’s religious discrimination and a violation of the civil rights law. They have every right to sue and should. The city and state should also be suing for violations of human rights laws for religious discrimination.
But won’t.
Imagine the tables turned and some conservative lashed out like that against gay’s....we’d have the MSM shouting and screeching endlessly and that business would be firebombed within a week...
“People forget that it’s explicitly stated that Christians are not prohibited from suing pagans, only other actual Christians.”
Correct. Take the twink to court.
AFAIK, it all began with the so-called Civil Rights Act. Through in the Bakke scotus decision. Now, special additional carve-outs for homos. Throw in academia’s screams about white privilege, and I wouldn’t be surprised at future Nuremberg-light laws against straight whites. Social Justice knows no end.
He could have a fellow fag or two in the place who are bodybuilders. Despite the stereotype, some in the homo community are quite strong and muscular, and could do serious damage to you if you pissed them off.
Now, it doesn't matter how strong or muscular you are if you whip out your trusty CCW when threatened. But, I doubt any responsible gun owner would want it to get to that level.
Just sayin'.
Throw. (blushing)
I’ll take them seriously when they go to muzzy bake shops and DEMAND a cake for with homo symbols on it.
There is no wrath like that of a scornful queer
Now they would say they have the right to do that, but you know I don't like to see a guy and a girl doing that in broad daylight.
If he starts spitting. No one wants semen all over their clothes.
“And the courts will say no harm no foul.”
Doubtful. Religion is a protected class under federal law.
OK, when does the DOJ file suit?
The "flaw" with 14A is that the drafters of the 14th Amendment gave Congress the power to enforce 14A.
”14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
More specifically, since we have a corrupt Congress left over from the lawless, anti-Christian Obama Administration, we can expect Congress to wrongly remain silent when activist states punish Christians for exercising their 1st Amendment-protected freedoms of religious expression and free speech.
Now for the remedy for this unfortunate situation …
Although Trump is reversing the anti-Christian policies of the Obama Administration, policies that Congress wrongly ignored, it remains that since the uniparty Congress wants to get rid of Trump that his first two years in office are arguably for practice. That being said ...
Drain the swamp sewer! Drain the sewer!
Remember in November 2018 !
Since corrupt Congress is the biggest part of the sewer (imo) that Trump wants to drain, it is actually up to us patriots to drain the sewer in the 2018 elections, patriots supporting Trump by pink-slipping as many career lawmakers as they can, replacing them with patriots who will support Trump.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the primary ballots.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to make sure that candidates are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed here.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Again, drain the sewer! Drain the sewer!
Bloggers work hard to get their stories and endure many hardships.
I hope they sue, sue, sue!
I hope Christian groups hold Bible studies in the coffee shop every day henceforth.
With video running.
What the owner said about Christ was shocking.
We need to pray for his salvation.
Let it begin!
No kidding. They are vying to take the libfreak award away from SodomCisco.
My mother's brother lives there. Nice folks, but very liberal in the modern way. I haven't visited too much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.