Posted on 10/05/2017 8:55:09 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates and former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said Wednesday that it will be difficult for special counsel Robert Mueller to prove criminal conduct in his probe into possible coordination between the President Trump's campaign and Russia.
I know a lot of people are sort of putting all their hopes into Bob Mueller. And Ive got tremendous confidence in Bob Mueller, Yates said in a joint interview with Bharara at Vanity Fair's New Establishment Summit in New York, according to The Wall Street Journal.
But the fact of the matter is, hes going to determine whether theres proof beyond a reasonable doubt that felonies were committed, that crimes were committed that can be used for prosecution or impeachment," she added.
Bharara emphasized that Mueller's investigation is intended to "find out the truth and apply the law and facts fairly" and said that he could ultimately decide against bringing a case.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Of course, there’s no way Trump could have beaten Hillary without an act of God or criminal conspiracy...
Even IF Trump and every member of his campaign colluded and planned the entire enterprise with the Russian government...there would be NO CRIME!
They would have to obtain proof somebody colluded with Russia to HACK the DNC or some other entity...or committed some other crime like illegal contributions etc.
Otherwise this is just a masturbatory exercise to relieve pressure on the psyche of the left.
No agenda...
Ive got tremendous confidence in Bob Mueller, Yates said in a joint
Preet Bharara is a vitamin supplement, not a name.
Is Jay Sekulow still part of his legal team?
Ive been saying for months there is an ongoing investigation of several libs-doubt its Cankles, but likely Rice, Lynch, Comey, etc. Its been very well sealed, as it should be.
You should never, ever hear of this until the trap is sprung.
I believe this article is the first indication of this. Libs suddenly realizing there will be no prosecution of any Trump ppl. Trump dismissed all his criminal lawyers some time ago.
I have yet to see MANAFORT confirm his house was raided. Thats very strange. Youd think hed be the first to scream, yet not a peep-that I can find. Why? Perhaps because there was no raid, but rather a news release about a raid to keep up pretenses that Mulehead is really into a Trump investigation.
______________________________
Trump has not dismissed his criminal lawyers and Manafort has confirmed with his friends that a raid did take place
Yep. Mueller has SQUAT.
All of this has given the hold-over, embedded swamp creatures in the NSA, CIA and FBI time to cover up tracks to the grossly illegal behaviors of the former Obama Administration regime and of the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Sigh....
Sources?
Best comment I've read in a long time. LOL!
But the DOJ raided Comey’s office the day he was fired. Who knows how much evidence was there.
Comey and Mueller are buddies. I’m betting that Comey will turn state’s evidence to nail others. Comey should hire a few body guards and not travel through Arkansas.
The upcoming impeachment is not going to be the doing of the Democrats.
Trump didnt steal THEIR party.
Good thing Trump didn’t fall for it. Good thing he recognized it for what it was and didn’t follow the cry of a lot of FReepers who were screaming “fire him!” That was what the dems were wanting....and Trump knew it.
Whatever.
The fact is, the Donkees don't have the votes. They lack a majority of the House and two thirds of the Senate.
The more the frustrated Democrats (and their military wing, Antifa) act out, the better! It just pisses off the average voter.
Burr is a burr in the saddle of the Republic!
Whatever. Whatever. You would only need 20-something House GOP to switch and 17 Senate. Doing that might just make it happen. It certainly wouldnt take to much to make 20-something house members to vote to impeach. The dems have those GOPe votes already...the GOPe just dont have the stones yet. Bottom line-Trump knows what hes doing here and you dont.
She’s kind of crooked, herself. She did some things while the USA in Atlanta, that would raise more than a few eyebrows, if ever looked into. Mostly with politically connected people or those with friends in high places, even though the cases were out in the public eye. Stuff, Joe Schmo wouldn’t walk away from. All favors done on behalf of democrat friends and associates.
I’m sure if any of that were looked into and brought out into the public sphere, we’d probably here very little, if anything, from her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.