Skip to comments.
Stephen Paddock Bought 33 Guns in 12 Months. That Should Be Illegal.
The Nation ^
| OCTOBER 23, 2017
| George Zornick
Posted on 10/04/2017 7:59:24 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That'll fix it. Fidiots. 🖕🏻
2
posted on
10/04/2017 8:00:25 PM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
>How much lethal firepower should citizens be allowed to possess?<
As much as we want, a$$wipe.
3
posted on
10/04/2017 8:00:58 PM PDT
by
x1stcav
(We have the guns. Do we have the will?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
4
posted on
10/04/2017 8:01:05 PM PDT
by
gundog
(Hail to the Chief, bitches.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That is less than three per month. What a slacker.
5
posted on
10/04/2017 8:04:03 PM PDT
by
Godebert
(CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
A 10 year old boy with a Marlin Model 60 and a sack full of .22LR could have done almost as much damage. It has nothing to do with the number of weapons. I’m sure the author would like us to return to muskets.
6
posted on
10/04/2017 8:04:23 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If those that stayed in adjacent hotel rooms had guns and explosives, they could have stopped the bad guy. But the hotel was unarmed, except the bad guy.
Good guys need proper guns even explosives so that bad guys can be stopped.
7
posted on
10/04/2017 8:05:52 PM PDT
by
sagar
To: E. Pluribus Unum
George Zornick published a stupid article in The Nation which completely ignored a very important Constitutional right. That should be illegal.
8
posted on
10/04/2017 8:07:20 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower”- NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.
9
posted on
10/04/2017 8:08:32 PM PDT
by
bunkerhill7
((("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione."))))))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What part of “shall not be infringed” do these douche nozzles not comprehend?
10
posted on
10/04/2017 8:09:05 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(AMERICA! THANK YOU FOR MAKING MY SCREEN NAME OBSOLETE!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
liberals spout 33 lies a day... that should be illegal !
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Citizens don't need the 2nd amendment, until the government tries to take away the 2nd amendment.
12
posted on
10/04/2017 8:09:56 PM PDT
by
Newbomb Turk
(Hey Newbomb, where is your bothers ElCamino ?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Who cares if he owns a thousand guns? He can only fire one at a time!
Liberal Idiots!
13
posted on
10/04/2017 8:09:59 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why should it be illegal?
Can only shoot one at a time.
14
posted on
10/04/2017 8:10:06 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Tagline is currently under repair!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I don’t say it should be illegal; but it should damn sure trigger him onto a pretty strict watchlist, no?
15
posted on
10/04/2017 8:10:36 PM PDT
by
Migraine
((A smartass who is right can be downright funny. A smartass who is wrong is just a smartass.))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thats nothing, as a fabricator and machinist i would dearly love to build a minigun, saw several simple three barrel designs years ago.
One guy built one for .22lr even.
16
posted on
10/04/2017 8:12:47 PM PDT
by
Daniel Ramsey
(Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best)
To: Migraine
“I don’t say it should be illegal; but it should damn sure trigger him onto a pretty strict watchlist, no?”
No, it shouldn’t.
L
17
posted on
10/04/2017 8:13:22 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
To: Migraine
Do you think that if he was on a “watchlist” that anyone would have seen him do anything at all?
Because I don’t.
18
posted on
10/04/2017 8:16:20 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Tagline is currently under repair!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not sure a .22LR will do a lot of damage at 300 yards. However, I wouldn’t stand 300 yards away and let you shoot at me so I could prove my opinion.
There is no reason one person needs that many guns. But the Constitution doesn’t say a reason is needed but fighting off a tyrannical government that’s trying to take away the people’s guns is a very good reason.
19
posted on
10/04/2017 8:19:39 PM PDT
by
Terry Mross
(Liver spots And blood thinners.)
To: rktman
Not more deadlier than any month in Shitcago. Gun Free Zone that it is
20
posted on
10/04/2017 8:23:08 PM PDT
by
wetgundog
(Mainstream Media, Lying Liars Lying.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson