To: E. Pluribus Unum
A 10 year old boy with a Marlin Model 60 and a sack full of .22LR could have done almost as much damage. It has nothing to do with the number of weapons. I’m sure the author would like us to return to muskets.
6 posted on
10/04/2017 8:04:23 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not sure a .22LR will do a lot of damage at 300 yards. However, I wouldn’t stand 300 yards away and let you shoot at me so I could prove my opinion.
There is no reason one person needs that many guns. But the Constitution doesn’t say a reason is needed but fighting off a tyrannical government that’s trying to take away the people’s guns is a very good reason.
19 posted on
10/04/2017 8:19:39 PM PDT by
Terry Mross
(Liver spots And blood thinners.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
35 posted on
10/04/2017 8:56:25 PM PDT by
txnativegop
(The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
My Marlin 60 never jams, and with my cheap scope I'm nailing the red at 400 meters. My cheapest rifle is my Mosberg 100 ATR in the 30-06 round (I got it on sale), and I'm hitting the nail at 600 meters. Money doesn't equal accuracy. Since I'm a Christian I could never kill another human being unless he or she was a threat to my family.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I am pretty sure that even with a musket it could have been bad.
Those 54 caliber minie balls were known to take off arms, legs, and heads during the Civil War.
61 posted on
10/04/2017 10:18:11 PM PDT by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson