Posted on 09/17/2017 2:29:28 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
Judge Jeanine Pirro slammed Hillary Clinton ..for continuing to harp on her 2016 loss of the presidency to Donald Trump.
"Snap out of it! Do I have to go through this again?" Pirro asked incredulously.
Clinton's new book, "What Happened," was released last week, and the former secretary of state has been appearing on television and book signings to promote it.
The book provides a lengthy inventory of all entities she blames for her loss, including herself, former FBI Director James Comey, Russia, sexism, Bernie Sanders, the New York Times, and Barack Obama.
Anyone who says prosecutors draft an exoneration before investigation is complete "has never prosecuted a case, is a complete idiot, or is an out-and-out liar."
Pirro described Clinton as a "cold calculated woman on the road to power by any means possible."
"Her reign was one of bold, brazen, in-your-face pay-to-play corruption," Pirro stated.
The judge called for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to open a new federal criminal investigation into Clinton.
"Impanel a grand jury immediately, and void the false Clinton immunity deals, easily done since each one has been violated," Judge Jeanine said.
"Hillary should not get a free pass because she lost an election."
(Excerpt) Read more at insider.foxnews.com ...
An Asian person might say she can’t get an erection.
And hey, they’d be right on three counts.
If she’s a judge then why isn’t she in a courtroom?
Is she ashamed of her current job title?
Spot on!
More money in TV...is my guess.
Hillary will get a pass not because she lost an election, but because she is one of the elite. The true elites don’t go to jail. It’s just not done.
“If she’s a judge then why isn’t she in a courtroom?”
Good question.
There are lot of individuals that even though their education or titles are not what they are doing, they decided at some point to take a different route.
I know many engineers that that have masters degrees in engineering and after many years of performing that work, moved into in marketing or sales.
Why would that be?
Most citizens of America are doing the hard work on behalf of their families, their communities and the nation itself, and they are focused on individuals whose lives are inspiring examples of rising above circumstances in order to achieve good for others.
Those ordinary citizens have no time or interest in hearing self-centered self-pity and blame for others from a woman who has, by hook or crook, acquired untold power over the lives of others and untold millions (perhaps billions) of dollars from personally exploiting that power.
What happened? "We, the People" happened. Get over it!
“If she’s a judge then why isn’t she in a courtroom?”
Why is Michael Savage with a PhD from University of California, Berkeley, in nutritional ethnomedicine and author of many books, doing talk radio?
I can kind of see sixth generation royalty imagining that they are entitled to be worshipped, but Hillary Clinton?
Hillary Clinton is a lying, thieving, bullying, cheating, dirty little snot from Nowhere, Illinois.
What exactly are we supposed to see that makes her royalty?
Oh no, he’s baaaaaack.
Because Doc Wiener wants attention.
Nyah, nyah. :^)
In some positions in life, you hold your job title even after you no longer work in that position
President
Governor
Doctors
There are other examples out there...
While I don’t think Judges come under this list, I may be wrong. Some folks may still be known as Judge (last name).
Regardless, the title on her show does serve to remind and to inform folks that she was a judge, and knows what she’s talking about.
When she agrees with us, that adds more weight to her views.
She agrees with us a lot, so I don’t see a problem with it.
This isn’t something new. Judge Wapner and a host of others have kept that title for television shows.
I don’t have a problem with it.
If I disagree with the person, I immediately wonder how great a judge the could have been.
I would love to see Pirro replace Sessions. She does have baggage, though, so there might be a problem being confirmed. (Nothing worse than any Dem’s baggage, but there IS the double standard.) Still, she’d be tough and successful as AG, so would love to see here there.
That was before most of us were even born.
It would take miracle to hold her accountable for a fraction of what she's done.
Yeah, there are a lot of leftist "Judges" that do great harm.
It's marketing. She's trying to provide herself some credence.
Me, I'm not particularly looking for media people to venerate.
No matter how they bill themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.