If she’s a judge then why isn’t she in a courtroom?
Is she ashamed of her current job title?
More money in TV...is my guess.
“If she’s a judge then why isn’t she in a courtroom?”
Good question.
There are lot of individuals that even though their education or titles are not what they are doing, they decided at some point to take a different route.
I know many engineers that that have masters degrees in engineering and after many years of performing that work, moved into in marketing or sales.
Why would that be?
“If she’s a judge then why isn’t she in a courtroom?”
Why is Michael Savage with a PhD from University of California, Berkeley, in nutritional ethnomedicine and author of many books, doing talk radio?
In some positions in life, you hold your job title even after you no longer work in that position
President
Governor
Doctors
There are other examples out there...
While I don’t think Judges come under this list, I may be wrong. Some folks may still be known as Judge (last name).
Regardless, the title on her show does serve to remind and to inform folks that she was a judge, and knows what she’s talking about.
When she agrees with us, that adds more weight to her views.
She agrees with us a lot, so I don’t see a problem with it.
This isn’t something new. Judge Wapner and a host of others have kept that title for television shows.
I don’t have a problem with it.
If I disagree with the person, I immediately wonder how great a judge the could have been.
That is a courtesy title from a former life used to alert viewers that she is accomplished in the legal field and is not just another Megyn Kelly, etc.
She can make more of a difference on TV. She is extremely effective, and a problem is that not enough conservatives are employed by MSM.
She can make more of a difference on TV. She is extremely effective, and a problem is that not enough conservatives are employed by MSM.
BECAUSE SHE’S RETIRED FROM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY...
Research is our friend...why not try it and quit trying to stir something up.