Exclusive – Kobach: It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire

Breitbart ^ | 7 Sep 2017 | KRIS W. KOBACH

[mandaladon]

Exclusive – Kobach: It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire U.S. Senate Race(Full Title)

For years, the mainstream media has ignored the problem of voter fraud and belittled those of us who are trying to do something about it. And when secretaries of state like me identify cases of fraud, we are told that the number of incidents of voter fraud is too insignificant to matter. Now, however, facts have come to light that indicate that a pivotal, close election was likely changed through voter fraud on November 8, 2016: New Hampshire’s U.S. Senate Seat, and perhaps also New Hampshire’s four electoral college votes in the presidential election.

New Hampshire is one of fifteen states that allow same-day voter registration. The benefit of same-day registration is that it allows a person who has procrastinated or has forgotten to register to nonetheless cast a ballot on election day. The downside of same-day registration is that it does not allow the state time to assess the eligibility of the voter. A volunteer poll worker simply accepts a modicum of identification and takes the voter at his word that he’s a U.S. citizen resident of the state who is eligible to vote.

New Hampshire is also a battleground state. Unlike neighboring Massachusetts and Vermont, which reliably vote for the Democrat in presidential elections, New Hampshire can swing either way. It has long been reported, anecdotally, that out-of-staters take advantage of New Hampshire’s same-day registration and head to the Granite State to cast fraudulent votes.

Now there’s proof.

According to statistics released by the Speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, on the date of the general election in November 2016, there were 6,540 same-day registrants who registered to vote in New Hampshire using an out-of-state driver’s license

[mandaladon]

So if those 6,540 voters were bona fide New Hampshire residents, they would get their driver’s license no later than January 7, 2017. However, the numbers tell a very different story. It turns out that, as of August 30, 2017 – nearly ten months after the election – only 1,014 of the 6,540 same-day registrants who registered with an out-of-state license had obtained a New Hampshire driver’s license. The other 5,526 individuals never obtained a New Hampshire driver’s license. And, of those 5,526, only 213 registered a vehicle in New Hampshire.

So 5,313 of those voters neither obtained a New Hampshire driver’s license nor registered a vehicle in New Hampshire. They have not followed the legal requirements for residents regarding driver’s licenses, and it appears that they are not actually residing in New Hampshire. It seems that they never were bona fide residents of the State.

5,513 is a big number – more than enough to swing two very important elections. The closest major election was the contest between incumbent Republican U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte and challenger Maggie Hassan (D). Hassan won the election by a razor-thin margin of 1,017 votes. Those 5,313 fraudulent votes were more than enough to swing the election. If 59.2 percent or more of them went for Hassan, then the election was stolen through voter fraud. That’s likely, since the surrounding states are Democrat strongholds.

It’s also possible that New Hampshire’s four electoral college votes were swung to Hillary Clinton through illegal voting by nonresidents. Clinton won New Hampshire by only 2,732 votes. If 74.8 percent of the 5,513 fraudulent votes were cast for Clinton, then the presidential election in New Hampshire was tipped as well.~~~~~~~~~~

[TBP]

So what else is new?

[TBP]

Not that Smelly Coyote was anything to write home about.

[mandaladon]

And that is already having consequences for the nation. If the 52-48 Republican-Democrat balance in the Senate were 53-47, it could change the balance in any number of votes – not the least of which would be the effort to repeal Obamacare. But the mainstream media will tell us, “Move along, there’s nothing to see here.” Voter fraud virtually never occurs.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Next time a Rat asks for proof, send them this article.

[Dalberg-Acton]

Dana Perino has flatly stated there is no voter fraud.

[SharpRightTurn]

“Exclusive – Kobach: It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire U.S. Senate Race(Full Title)”

Unpossible, the Dims said there was no illegal voting.

[adorno]

...the mainstream media has ignored the problem of voter fraud and belittled those of us who are trying to do something about it

The mainstream media has not ignored the "problem". In fact, they are the architects of the problem, which to then is not a problem at all. The media has known about the "problem" and they would have preferred that nobody brought up the issue, because discussing the issue would bring up the matter of collusion with democrats to create "the problem".

Of course they want to belittle those that shine a light on the problem, because, fixing the problem is not in their best interests nor in the interests of democrats. Fixing the problem would entail that democrats get rid of a large part of their best and loyal voter constituency, that being the fraudulent votes.

[theoilpainter]

At the very least, we know who those people are. Why not prosecute them?

[Paladin2]

It’s an inconvenient Truth.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Dana works for the Busch family who work for the Rothschild family. What did you expect her to say?

[Kalamata]

This really matters. I know it matters to DJT. Maybe he will make NH go back and de-certify the results, and correct them. Then history will record he won New Hampshire! And then it’s on to the next many corrupt states! : )

[Impy]

Ayotte was robbed, and Rep. Frank Gunita robbed of his seat as well and President Trump robbed of 4 electoral votes.

[CivilWarBrewing]

Dana Perino is seven shingles short of a roof. If you put a mirror in the bottom of her pool she would drown. Her and her UGLY dog Jasper, too. Oh wait never mind.. Save the dog, I love dogs.

[RitaOK]

EXCELLENT POST. Great column.

Poor Hillary. If that invasion could dunk that awful pain in the neck Ayotte, then why wouldn’t they return to drag Hillary’s buttkus over the line?

Do you suppose the General Election is so much more closely manned and watched they could not dare to return at all, or in such large numbers?

[Norseman]

First you have to investigate them. And if they can’t prove they moved to NH sometime in the past year, you’re right, they should be prosecuted.

Their social media networks should also be investigated to determine which direction they lean politically, if any. I suspect anyone willing to commit voter fraud in such an obvious manner would be sharing their political thinking online.

[TheConservativeTejano]

Dana Perino has flatly stated there is no voter fraud.

Dana Perino is such a Rino just like her former boss W.

Dana Perino is really one big Fake News gal nowadays.

We just can not trust anybody like Dana Perino from Faux News!

[LurkedLongEnough]

The registrars must have taken lessons from urban areas of Connecticut. There’s extensions of polling hours there when not enough of the “correct” votes are legit so behind the scenes fraud and “good” ballot photocopying can take place.

[PIF]

“Dana Perino has flatly stated there is no voter fraud.”

—

Many of us have stated there is no Dana Perino ...

[thinden]

Great job kobach

[Revolutionary]

The election should be decertified and a special election held for Senator. In the interim the Republican governor should appoint a Senator.