[Bobalu]

[Dilbert San Diego]

The problem with the alt-right, is just that. They are an alternative to conservatism, and clearly not a good one.

---

Is the “ALT RIGHT” an actual organization, or is it a term made up by the left, to give them a boogeyman, a strawman, whom they can say they are fighting against?

[ifinnegan]

Exactly. Democrats want to hide their history.

[Dilbert San Diego]

One-hundred years later, it was the party that cast the votes for the Civil Rights movement and later for the rights of women to vote. It’s not the party that’s about to give it all back because of a few extremists claiming to be conservatives.

---

Some factual errors here. Women got the right to vote in all states via the 19th amendment, in 1920. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed in 1964. How does it follow that they voted “later” for the right of women to vote??

[TomGuy]

Democrats can’t whitewash history by removing statues

Look again. It isn't just the Democrats who are doing this. It is also Republican politicians who are pulling down Confederate flags and statues and portraits, etc.

Politicians and activites in both political parties are involved in this Grand Cleansing.

[soycd]

Maybe not, but darn few will survive their party platform. Stink eye not included.

I do not go boating with democrats knowingly ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l69WZhjxs_g&list=RDVorr7ni7sNM&index=28

[TigersEye]

If they whitewash enough history we can say that slavery never happened. Is that what they want?

[Rembrandt]

Women got the right to vote in 1920. The first Civil Rights vote (that I’m aware of) came in 1956 during, and with the help of, the Republican Eisenhower administration. It suffered defeat by elements of the Democrat party.

[Archie Bunker on steroids]

The correct description is “redwashing” history

[luvie]

If they destroy their history, then “we” don’t have to give them food stamps, welfare, reparations, etc....because their grievances don’t exist any more.