Posted on 08/11/2017 12:10:03 PM PDT by Kaslin
Google's firing of software engineer James Damore for daring to express politically incorrect ideas in an internal memo is the latest example of the political left's tyrannical propensity to suppress speech, thought and dissent.
Almost as troubling as the left's policing is its apparent obliviousness toward its own hypocrisy and the danger it poses to the liberal exchange of ideas. While constitutional issues may not be involved in the Google case because no state action is involved, moral shaming has become a chilling cudgel in the hands of leftist-dominated institutions.
In his memo, Damore notes that Google's political bias silences dissenting opinion supposedly to shield employees from offensive ideas and protect their psychological safety. "But shaming into silence," writes Damore, "is the antithesis of psychological safety. This silencing has created an ideological echo chamber where some ideas are too sacred to be honestly discussed."
Damore concedes that all people have biases but that open and honest discussion can highlight these biases and help us grow. He says he wrote the memo to encourage such a discussion about Google's biases, a discussion that is being silenced by "the dominant ideology."
Damore opines that both the political left and right have moral biases. "Only facts and reason can shed light on these biases," he says, "but when it comes to diversity and inclusion, Google's left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence. This silence removes any checks against encroaching extremist and authoritarian policies."
He then details how this bias affects Google's explanation for the gender gap in the tech world and leadership positions: Its leftist bias tells it that the gap is due to differential treatment (discrimination and injustices). It then applies authoritarian measures that actually discriminate against men to achieve equal representation. This is the wrong approach, says Damore, because the gender gap is partially attributable to many biological differences between men and women, and because there are "non-discriminatory ways to reduce the gender gap."
Stated more simply, biologically based differences between the sexes in certain abilities and preferences, as opposed to gender bias and discrimination, are why there are fewer women in tech jobs and leadership positions. Redistributing these positions could be more harmful than helpful to employees and the company. We should think of people as individuals, not as interchangeable members of groups.
It's ironic that such leftist thinking purports to enhance the worth of women (or members of other allegedly victimized groups) but instead disrespects and devalues their human dignity by imposing groupwide remedies without regard to individual qualities and behavior.
We must recognize that Damore is making two separate but interrelated complaints. He is saying that Google is applying totalitarian groupthink to its gender bias problem and thus misanalyzing it; and that this same groupthink also prevents open and honest discussion of the problem by forbidding the expression of dissenting views.
It's one thing for Google honchos to strongly disagree with the thrust of Damore's substantive arguments concerning the reasons for the gender gap. But it's quite another for them to effectively ban dissent and summarily fire him for dissenting.
But this is nothing new for the left. For example, many leftists seek to ban debate on "climate change" through cultural fiat, declaring that an irrefutable scientific consensus has been established. In the name of science -- which by definition demands that such issues always remain open to challenge -- they shut down dissent. Similarly, they say certain views will not be tolerated on college campuses because they are offensive to certain people. On many of these same campuses, they commit violence to people and property to protest conservative speakers whose speech they think could lead to violence. Such preposterous thinking is as widespread as it is ludicrous. Through sophistry and semantic legerdemain, the left has ushered in an era of intellectual anarchy.
Leftists see themselves as stewards of enlightened thinking -- of liberal academic inquiry, tolerance and diversity -- but once again, they prove themselves to be Stalinist tailors of intellectual straightjackets who flagrantly violate the very spirit of free expression on which America was founded.
Leftists are ingenious manufacturers of twisted excuses to justify their indefensible actions. But intellectual honesty screams for an accounting in these cases. They might be fooling themselves into believing they are advancing the greater good, but they're not fooling those outside the intellectual prisons of their pride-spawned, self-congratulatory oppression.
For # 5 - they will throw you under the bus just out of fear of losing their jobs. Nowadays that usually equates to losing your home, savings, credit history...
I don’t know why this guy thought he could publicly attack his employer without consequences. If I have issues with my company, they’d be the last to know (as I exited). I assume this guy knew the risks.
+1
Yep. Don't complain about anything, even about issues that you think are innocuous. Even your salary. If you don't like something, and it's bad enough, find another job.
I assume this guy knew the risks.
I don't know. He seemed pretty naive. He learned some hard lessons about work and life.
I don’t mind voicing issues with my supervisor (which has risks, but nothing like publicly slamming the company). I’m also not one to say “Go elsewhere” right off the bat because I know many of us can’t. This was just a strange way to do it - unless he intended to leave anyway, in which case it is very funny. He’ll probably have to change his name to find another job in a large company, though.
truth is hate speech to those that hate truth...
I would think it’s high time that JimRob stop utilizing Google-Analytics on this site. I questioned its use back when it started showing up here. I have always blocked all scripting from Google other than while using their maps.
I guess the natural differentiators that result in THOSE disparities is to be ignored.
-PJ
The Google beast has its meal, so the others are safe for now.
-PJ
Then comes tomorrow...dinner time again!
The only thing that has saved America so far is that the federal bureaucracy is too slow and stupid to analyze and act upon the data in a reasonable time frame. They are like a python that is choking while trying to swallow 9 rabbits at the same time. Google/Alphabet must be broken up using existing federal antitrust laws.
I assume you meant to say I can only wish Google, a DARPA funded company from the get-go, a slow death. If so I agree with you 100 %
I spent a year at Microsoft in 2004 through 2005, and I can tell that you just were not paying attention. You probably had a skill that Microsoft really needed at the time so that they would overlook your political heresies.
I remember telling MICROSOFT business leadership at the time that they were stupid for insourcing Indians instead of Americans. I told them to their face that someday they would be working for an insourced CEO like a bunch of little bitches. The only thing I have to say that vindicates my prediction is “Satya Narayana Nadella”. What a bunch of ball-less cucks at Microsoft.
True that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.