Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside Erik Prince’s secret proposal to outsource the war in Afghanistan
Washington Post ^ | 09 August 2017 | Josh Rogin

Posted on 08/11/2017 9:23:10 AM PDT by Lorianne

Businessman and Blackwater founder Erik Prince has been shopping around Washington a detailed proposal for replacing thousands of American soldiers in Afghanistan with contractors from foreign countries led by a “viceroy” with almost unfettered power over U.S. military and diplomatic policy.

Prince has been public about the broad outlines of his plan, which is reportedly supported by some senior White House officials, including chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon, but many crucial details have not been brought into public view, until now. Prince has laid out his proposal in a PowerPoint presentation to government officials, lawmakers and congressional officials.

Entitled “A Strategic Economy of Force,” it is nothing less than a plan to change the way Afghanistan is governed, how the war is fought and the very nature of the U.S.-Afghan bilateral relationship.

Prince’s plan is opposed by senior military leaders including national security adviser H.R. McMaster, key lawmakers who have received Prince’s brief and senior military officials who have fought in Afghanistan over the past 16 years. Prince has described the proposal in interviews this week as a plan to send 5,500 private military contractors to embed with Afghan National Security Forces units at the battalion level to fight the Taliban, supported by a 90-plane private air force. Prince presents the plan as an alternative for President Trump to the proposal put forth by his top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Nicholson, who has publicly called for a “few thousand” more U.S. troops to be added to the approximately 8,200 U.S. soldiers there now.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: blackwater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
I don't want to pay for this either. We should get out of Afghanistan. If private people want to go on their own dime to try to 'fix" Afghanistan ... go right ahead.
1 posted on 08/11/2017 9:23:10 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
No more dead troops I'm disappointed President Trump has not gotten us out of this mess.
2 posted on 08/11/2017 9:27:45 AM PDT by angcat (THANK YOU LORD FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Outsourcing Afghanistan

"Elo... dis is Steve from Afghanistan, how may I help you?"


3 posted on 08/11/2017 9:27:59 AM PDT by bar sin·is·ter (Climate Scientology - another example of science fiction morphing into a religious cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Think of the only thing in Afghanistan that has actually increased since 2001.

Opium production.

50% of the world’s production.

Now you know why we have been there for 16 years.


4 posted on 08/11/2017 9:29:06 AM PDT by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I do not want to govern Afghanistan, even remotely.


5 posted on 08/11/2017 9:29:10 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Does he get to pay for this from the profits of a REM mining operation.

We are not there to get rid of anyone. We are not there to stop the drug trade.

We are there for the rare elements used in computers.

It is sickening.


6 posted on 08/11/2017 9:30:59 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

And if we are going to appoint a Viceroy, shouldnt we offer the job to one of the Montbatten’s first?


7 posted on 08/11/2017 9:32:01 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

There maybe something to this. Bring all our guys home. Turn a blind eye while foreign mercenaries do what the hell ever they want. Wait 12 months. The Afghanis will be begging us to come save them. Tell them to pound sand.


8 posted on 08/11/2017 9:40:16 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
Blackwater would never propose such a thing unless they knew damn well that they were getting paid in U.S. dollars -- by U.S. taxpayers.

This has to be one of the dumbest proposals I've ever seen.

9 posted on 08/11/2017 10:08:28 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Letter of Marque?


10 posted on 08/11/2017 10:11:28 AM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Erik Prince was on CSPAN's Washington Journal this AM, explaining his proposal. It's a forever deal with about 20% of the annual costs the US now endures. It was disturbing that it sounds a real lot like the gov would be paying private corporations to keep undesirable forces out of the government. It sounds like a new, more open, formula for regime manipulation. The questions callers asked were quite knowledgeable and very cynical of the program.

He played the "don't give ISIS and Taliban terrorists a place to flourish" card.

11 posted on 08/11/2017 10:29:33 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

If it’s only money I say go for it.


12 posted on 08/11/2017 10:44:34 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Afghanistan would be good laboratory. It could be used in other areas. Why isn’t the French Foreign Legion used? Surrender monkeys?


13 posted on 08/11/2017 10:46:26 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Fake News.
Bannon knows getting further involved in Afghanistan is a stupid idea...unless you are McCain and his GF


14 posted on 08/11/2017 10:48:05 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

They could use UN money. Give the rest of the world some skin in the game. Then there are those in the military who cannot function outside a war zone. Sickos. Give them a big raise in pay.


15 posted on 08/11/2017 10:54:04 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Trump is a businessman. I wouldn’t bet against it. What do we have to lose? Killed contractors? They don’t have to be American, just volunteers.


16 posted on 08/11/2017 10:55:50 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grania

I missed that but yes, his proposal does not make sense from any perspective (except as a money maker for military contractors).

Afghanistan is already (again) 2/3 controlled by the Taliban and/or AQ. We accomplished nothing there. Also the central government, such as it was, was never strong, so we would not be returning them to something at was lost ... they never have had a real ‘nation’ in the sense of a centralized government that had any kind of control militarily or otherwise in the country.

To say the goal is to return Afghanistan to a strong central government and away from tribal control is ahistorical and a lie couched in wishful thinking.


17 posted on 08/11/2017 11:22:49 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
What I cynically heard was a private corporation having a plan to take over the wealth of a dysfunctional nation, with the financing and blessing of the US. It's regime change and a confiscation of a nation's wealth without even bothering with the middleman.

Remember the quip a few years back "which corporation will be the first to be a UN member"? This seems to bring up another question "Will corporations take over some nations"?

So, I'm a conspiracy theory believer. It does seem that conspiracy theories are correct more often than they're proven incorrect.

18 posted on 08/11/2017 11:40:05 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

:) very good


19 posted on 08/11/2017 11:45:12 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

It would be a final step(opportunity) toward total withdrawal.


20 posted on 08/11/2017 11:57:56 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson