Posted on 08/09/2017 5:49:19 AM PDT by fwdude
The horrific treatment of Dr. Paul Church has become a nightmare affecting him, of course, but ultimately all of us as well. Because he told the medical truth and refused to bow to political correctness on this critical public health issue, he has now been banned from four prominent Boston area hospitals and a urology clinic.
This is the frightening state of todays medical profession.
Dr. Church is a urologist who was on the staff of several major Boston area hospitals and clinics for nearly 30 years. He was on the faculty of Harvard Medical School. He has done research on diagnosing prostate and bladder cancer, and has spoken to educational and civic groups on the subject of high-risk sexual behaviors.
(Excerpt) Read more at massresistance.org ...
I LOVED living in Boston, way back when. It was Left, but still pretty rational. I love to visit now, but couldn’t live in that crushing PC atmosphere again.
Too bad you dont believe in Science!
I believe....
XX + XX = FAIL
XY + XY = FAIL
XX + XY = Human
I do, too. In my career, I was a Scientist. These previous comments to me were from my S-i-L, who was a Government employee in the Postal Service. Yet I AM THE ONE who doesn’t believe in Science. Yeah, right.
I generally don’t embrace let alone “eat” things that disgust me.
You?
OOOOHH, is that last one on a bumper sticker somewhere. I would definitely put that one on my E350.
You’re so right. The left, as in this case with Dr. Church, refuses to listen to what the science says when it goes against the ideology that they want to promote.
Too bad the Left doesnt accept actual science when it goes against their PC notions.
“is becoming so dishonest in one regard,”
Guess you haven’t heard of second-hand smoke.
The LGBT thing would not be the first time they’ve pushed an agenda over medicine.
It’s informative that a lot of public hospitals are increasingly staffed by African doctors, many of whom are decidedly anti-sodomy.
If the guy was a Muslim or black hed still have his appointment.
or if he were female...he should have transgendered, then spoken out...
Oh, I think he understood that, but he was sad about the demise of the hospital, as were the numerous appreciative townspeople who attended his funeral service. Although he retired from active practice around 1990, he continued in a limited role at a nursing home for 25 more years. He was well-loved in the town and greatly honored by family, friends, and former patients.
The combined endowments of all the august institutions that done him wrong, must be close to 50 or 60 billion.
He just needs to sue the hell out of all these institutions and retire from urology.
No brainer.
Oh yeah change venue to a more rednecky jurisdiction in MA.
Not Provincetown or Boston or Cambridge.
Try Orange, West Brookfield, Turners Falls, Belchertown (GREAT name LOL!), Greenfield, Baldwinville, Sturbridge, Lee, Adams, Colrain.
Definitely not Lynn.
City of Sin.
You don't come out the way you went in.
I have another 20 links to studies asserting the same conclusion.
I continue to press my message at every chance.
The problem is that what goes on behind closed doors seeps out.....example...person contracts disease doing something behind closed doors...well now they can go infect someone else behind closed doors...but then when they go and infect someone else who needs treatment. and then everyone soon knows about it...family...spouse...friends...docs..nurses...pharmacists..
coworkers...medicare...lab workers...medical insurance paymasters...physical therapists...I think you can criticize something that gets out from “behind closed doors” if it gets out and adversely effects you or others.
It’s not just African doctors. Hospitals are filled with Middle Eastern doctors. Imagine going to a Muslim Ob-Gyn - an Obie-Guynie as Obama called them.
I don’t “hate” the measles, or any other communicable disease.
That doesn’t mean I don’t recognize the associated risk.
Been regurgitating SJWeese long?
psy·cho·sissīˈkōsəs/noun
a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality.
"According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages.The first stage being "demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism.Most of the activity of the department [KGB] was to compile huge amount / volume of information, on individuals who were instrumental in creating public opinion. Publisher, editors, journalists, uh actors, educationalists, professors of political science. Members of parliament, representatives of business circles.Most of these people were divided roughly into two groups: those who would tow the Soviet foreign policy, they would be promoted to positions of power through media and public manipulation; [and] those who refuse the Soviet influence in their own country would be character assassinated OR executed physically, come Revolution. "--KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov--Soviet Subversion of the Free Press (Ideological subversion, Destabilization, CRISIS - and the KGB)
You need to work on your reading comprehension as you don’t seem to quite grasp what I actually said.
What makes you think I don’t “recognize the associated risk” of homosexual behavior?
Link didn’t work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.