Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate Science Comes Up Short
Quadrant Online ^ | 7/28/2017 | Tony Thomas

Posted on 07/30/2017 7:34:41 AM PDT by grimalkin

People unwilling to act on the climate-crisis narrative should be assisted with drugs that improve and promote conformity, according to eminent bio-ethicist Professor Matthew Liao, of New York University, who also wants to see parents dosing their children with hormones and diets to keep them shorter and less of a burden on the planet.

He wants such people to be given the ‘love drug/cuddle chemical’ oxytocin. This would increase their trust and empathy and make them more ready to change to emission-saving lifestyles.

As his peer-reviewed study puts it, “Pharmacologically induced altruism and empathy could increase the likelihood that we adopt the necessary behavioral and market solutions for curbing climate change.” He emphasises there would be no coercion. The drugs would merely help those who want to be climate-friendly behaviour but lack the willpower

Once sufficiently drugged, parents would be less likely to reject notions of “human engineering” techniques that will be needed to create Humans 2.0. These amended species will be 15cm shorter than now, hence more energy efficient and less resource-demanding. His study, Human Engineering and Climate Change, is in Ethics, Policy and the Environment.[1]

(Excerpt) Read more at quadrant.org.au ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: climate; eugenics; hoax; nyu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: grimalkin
Conformity . . .


21 posted on 07/30/2017 8:16:03 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
How is it not accurate? Is this video a hoax?

Matthew Liao - Engineer Humans to Stop Climate Change (Ideas at the House)

Also, this was not posted in breaking news. The age of the article should be irrelevant unless FR has a requirement I'm not aware of.

22 posted on 07/30/2017 8:16:28 AM PDT by grimalkin (You have enemies? Good. It means youÂ’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life. - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

In. Other words drug, DRUG Them up. Make LibTurd DUIMMYCRATS.


23 posted on 07/30/2017 8:21:45 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
"In his book, The Abolition of Man, Lewis was prophetic in pointing out that relativism—the idea that there are no absolute truths—would lead to the decay of morality and a lack of virtue within society. Without a belief in and the teaching of universal moral laws, we fail to educate the heart and are left with intelligent men who behave like animals or as Lewis puts it, “Men without Chests.”

Exactly what was said here: Francis A. Schaeffer has argued, “If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer, How Shall We Then Live? (Old Tappan NJ: Fleming H Revell Company, 1976), p. 224.

This is the logical consequence of secular humanism.When man is the measure of all things, God's rightful place as the measure of all things is replaced with whatever is the zeitgeist of the day. It is now the earth and its worship in place of God. Man has become a fool--unfortunately, he does not know it.

24 posted on 07/30/2017 8:23:27 AM PDT by Fungi (Mucor roxii is not a rock band.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

Ethics? Oh gee. Or a total lack thereof.


25 posted on 07/30/2017 8:33:14 AM PDT by Trumpet 1 (US Constitution is my guide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

Yes this is the kind of moral blind “moral innovator” Lewis described in all three lectures in the Abolition of Man of which that was the first. Also made me think of “Brave New World”.


26 posted on 07/30/2017 8:38:28 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
S. Matthew Liao
NYU Center for Bioethics
Phone: (212) 998-3672
Email: matthew.liao@nyu.edu
27 posted on 07/30/2017 8:38:58 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

Isn’t this similar to what the Nazi’s were experimenting with in WWII?


28 posted on 07/30/2017 8:49:33 AM PDT by kevinm13 (Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

They want to do the following to people who don’t believe their climate lies:
Jail them
Fire them
Punish them
Wait for them to die
Kill them
Drug them

Who are the real Nazis?


29 posted on 07/30/2017 8:58:45 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
the fact this guy actually believes this kind of thing is a good idea is terrifying on several levels.

He's no worse than many other academic loons.

There are many members of the "deep green" movement who want to see the entire human race wiped out, and many more who want to see a mass "die-off" of between 90 and 99% of the human population.

30 posted on 07/30/2017 9:13:04 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Sounds like the plot of a Michael Crichton work. Unfortunately, some of these loons want to see it a reality, not fiction. They’re insane, literally, certifiably insane and should be treated as such.


31 posted on 07/30/2017 9:25:13 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Doing my part to help make America great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

And they think that they would be spared.


32 posted on 07/30/2017 9:28:06 AM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

And he doesn’t know the first thing about thermodynamics or biology. Larger animals are more energy efficient than small ones.

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/12/science/of-mice-and-elephants-a-matter-of-scale.html


33 posted on 07/30/2017 9:43:44 AM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
It was/is an esoteric subject of discussion of preemptive engineering methods of dealing with global warming.

Similarly, you could also mention engineering the chemical make-up of the atmosphere to reflect the suns rays as a method of offsetting the effects of CO2. This also was and is a subject of discussion of preemptively dealing with global warming.

Another of those methods that was discussed back then and was actually done was the addition of iron filings into the Pacific as a way to stimulate the food chain that would ultimately produce more salmon.

As for the issue of the age of the article, this is another example of taking a previously discounted alarmist conspiracy hoax and re-inventing it.

But let me tell you, it was much more effective 5 years ago when Drudge linked to it.

34 posted on 07/30/2017 9:52:35 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Oh Ford! GMTA.


35 posted on 07/30/2017 11:10:53 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson