Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCARAMUCCI DROPS BOMB: Says 3 To 4 Dirty Leakers To Be Fired Friday
GP ^ | 07/27/17 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 07/27/2017 5:51:05 PM PDT by Enlightened1

In an explosive interview with with the New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza, Anthony Scaramucci issued his sternest warning yet to those leaking information to the press.

Scaramucci said he wants to “f*cking kill all the leakers and I want to get the President’s agenda on track so we can succeed for the American people.”

 

Now this…
Scaramucci also told Lizza he would fire three to four more leakers on Friday.


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fired; friday; leakers; scaramucci; second100days; trump; trumpmedia; whitehouse; yourefired
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-352 next last
To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
AMEN, Trump’s core supporters are largely EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS.......

Core supporters? LOL! Trump's core supporters are white guys with tattoos. We like the bad language.

Nobody said draining the swamp was going to be pretty. You might want to close your ears while the adults deal with this ugly business.

281 posted on 07/28/2017 1:53:45 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Concentrate; bonfire; HarleyLady27
Well done, nopardons!  You debate with the savage eloquence of the SCAREamooch and great GOREka.

By the power vested in me as a fellow Deplorable rascal, I hereby award you the H. L. Mencken Memorial Prize for Distinguished MAGA Commentary.


282 posted on 07/28/2017 2:07:47 AM PDT by poconopundit (CNN is... Corruption News Neglected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit
No. Not really since I don't believe Trump uses social media well. The perspective here on FR is that Trump is very successful with social media since many here like his tweets - it makes them chuckle and feel a since of vindication by socking it to whomever he is socking it to. However, I think one needs to judge Trump's use of social media using one metric and that is, are his tweets advancing his agenda, which is why we voted for him. The answer is no.

It is the president's responsibility to rally the people around his agenda and motivate the people to let their reps and senators know what they want. Reagan understood that and managed to go over the media's head in a world with no social media. Trump thinks he can get what he wants by insulting people and so far it is not working.

Trump has no clue on how to build support on Capitol Hill. Are there people around him giving him advice and he is not listening or are those around him also clueless? We don't know. Is anyone really surprised McCain voted against the skinny repeal tonight. McCain will always vote against Trump when it is close after being humiliated by Trump last year. Flame away. I don't like McCain anymore than the next person here, but I do understand when you want someone's vote, you don't publicly humiliate them.

Trump breeds dysfunction and then lights the match and wonders why there is complete chaos in the White House.

I do believe the entire town is against Trump and he has a tough fight, but he has made it even harder. The whole town was against Reagan, too. One was strategic and surrounded himself with professionals focused on his agenda. The other is flailing, grabbing at straws and surrounded himself with family (who don't even agree with his agenda - why would a president surround himself with people who don't want to advance his agenda and actively argue against it? This is a fatal flaw.) and others who are focused on back stabbing, leaking and a new hire giving an interview so poisonous that it is guaranteed to make the White House even more chaotic. We now know why Spicer resigned immediately when he found out Scaramucci was going to be his boss. How many people here would want to work for someone like Scaramucci?

I voted for Trump and expected him to break some furniture and it is never pleasant business, but the furniture being broken is his own.

283 posted on 07/28/2017 2:23:15 AM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

Well, we’re going to differ on this point. But thanks for your good reasoning.

I think social media is more than Trump’s tweets. And one function of the tweets do is fire up Deplorables and the grass roots networks that will ultimately win the day — perhaps when we get new blood in Congress.

Take a guy like Bill Mitchell on Twitter. He’s building quite a following and a new internet TV network. I think you’re going to see all sorts of grass roots MAGA rallies in the next year and a half.

As I recall Reagan, he didn’t have the advantage that Trump has with a majority (or almost majority) Congress. He had to fight Tip O’Neil.

Then again, Washington corruption probably wasn’t as deep as it is today so it requires more daring measures. I don’t approve of Scaramucci’s language, however, as the new guy coming into a leaking White House, he needs to show his toughness right away to establish authority. Later on, he can settle down somewhat.


284 posted on 07/28/2017 3:10:35 AM PDT by poconopundit (CNN is... Corruption News Neglected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Dave W
"You obviously don’t understand the rules and don’t care to. The ignorance on this website is amazing. 23 posted on 12/12/2015, 4:59:41 PM by Dave W "

Didn't you get the zot, about a year ago?

285 posted on 07/28/2017 3:29:37 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Prosecute the win. Run up the score.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

LOL - I’m not surprised at all, and agree with you.


286 posted on 07/28/2017 3:37:15 AM PDT by JubJub (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I’m not at all offended. I just don’t think it was wise, for many reasons.


287 posted on 07/28/2017 3:40:52 AM PDT by JubJub (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Bannon is not Danton. Rather he is Fouche, Napoleons minister of police, famous for saying, “it is not enough to merely kill a man, you must destroy his reputation.”


288 posted on 07/28/2017 4:00:55 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Gump Shrimp

“Yeah.. Cruz lost... get over it”

I voted for Trump.


289 posted on 07/28/2017 4:34:39 AM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

My advise is to stop talking about it, clean up the language and get on with firing them!


290 posted on 07/28/2017 5:26:02 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

It was Sean Hannity that said during Thursday’s opening monologe, “He told me he thought it was off the record.”


291 posted on 07/28/2017 5:32:41 AM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental illness: A totalitarian psyche.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

They seek him heah, they seek him theah, the elusive Scarlet Pimpernel....


292 posted on 07/28/2017 5:36:32 AM PDT by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
Lies. He is a registered republican, campaigned for Romney in 2012, campaigned for Trump in 2016. I bet you were one of the Cruzrs saying the same thing about Trump last year.

I had someone on here trying to tell me that Scarramucci was a Never Trumper. Mooch was NEVER a never Trumper. He was a Scott Walker supporter early on but once he decided to back Trump he was a full on Trump guy.

If supporting a candidate prior to supporting Trump makes you a Never Trumper then I'd guess about 75% of Freepers would be Never Trumpers.

293 posted on 07/28/2017 5:42:05 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

It was I who just hit abuse on you. Just so you’ll know.


294 posted on 07/28/2017 5:43:00 AM PDT by OKSooner (Never take a known wise-ass to the shooting range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
How can he legally fire a govt employee

Really? You don't have to be an official employee to walk into someones office and say 'The President says to pack up your crap and get out.'

295 posted on 07/28/2017 5:44:34 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Are Scaramucci’s deleted tweets “fake news” too? I heard him on Wall Street week say he voted for Obama. Most of us held our noses to vote for Romney. A vote/campaigning for Romney is hardly evidence that Scaramucci is not a NE liberal.

If he has come to Jesus and now gets the job done, fantastic. But it’s delusional to ignore the fact that his history and positions have been left, liberal and progressive.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/anthony-scaramuccis-old-tweets-reveal-liberal-views-on-climate-abortion-gay-rights-border-wall/article/2629415


296 posted on 07/28/2017 5:46:24 AM PDT by MyDogAteMyBallot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Drain the swamp!


297 posted on 07/28/2017 5:49:16 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

I guess people are forgetting that this is the land of federal regulations and unions.

If melania tells preibus he is fired...that wont be enough. I doubt he is fired at that moment..I also doubt scaramucci as a non employee can go into an office and tell Short he is fired...and that is enough at that moment

Over and over I see posts from people here that think the govt can be run as a business. Tons of regulations say differently


298 posted on 07/28/2017 5:57:35 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
You have gone from worshipping the ground GWB walked on, to now loving no matter what is thrown at you by the current regime.

The use of the term "regime" tells me all I need to know about you. You're a Never-Trumper and you take the term literally.

I don't worship any politician. I sure don't faint when men act like men and take a no nonsense approach things.

Think about it.....what was the the top story yesterday. It was Mooch. Pushed to just below the surface was Trump's "no transgenders in the military" order. Hmmmmmm, works for me.

299 posted on 07/28/2017 6:04:52 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (<---has now left CA for NV, where God/guns have not been outlawed! She's done and he's won!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Presidential appointees serve at the pleasure of the President and can be fired at any time. It’s different for career people but not appointees.


300 posted on 07/28/2017 6:09:14 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-352 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson