Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Afghanistan: Muslim soldiers are using boys as sex slaves, and the U.S. is looking the other way
Jihad Watch ^ | July 19, 2017 | Robert Spencer

Posted on 07/19/2017 11:45:13 AM PDT by Lera

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Lera

During the first Gulf War there were LHA’s offshore Basra. They had major medical facilities, several doctors and a bunch of Corpsman.

The Marines rescued a couple of hundred boys from the Iraqi troops and brought them to the two LHAs offshore.

Syphilis, Gonorrhea and torn rectums in at least 75%. They were kept as sex slaves until they were old enough to enlist...just like their tormentors. And those before them.

It’s the pathway to the Arab/Muslim army.


21 posted on 07/19/2017 12:45:43 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lera

If a country can’t declare war,it should not go to war. I am far from a Paulbot BTW.As for all US military follies from Korea to WOT, it has come to a tremendous waste of blood and treasure with America coming out with pretty much nothing to show for it. Close to 10,000 soldiers dead in Afghanistan and Iraq,countless permanently damaged,military exhausted and trillions down the toilet for what? The offspring of soldiers who faught in 2001 will soon join the fight. If a conflict goes on this long, there is something seriously wrong. Hubris and pride seem to be an issue among others such as Chicken Hawk mania.


22 posted on 07/19/2017 12:47:13 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lera

Not to mention most of the worlds poppy supply for heroin is grown in Afghanistan, protected by the US military.

Sorry. Spray vegetation killer on the fields and leave.


23 posted on 07/19/2017 12:50:08 PM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lera

Bitch bitch bitch

Why worry about boys in Afghanistan when youth by the hundreds are being shot and killed in Chicago?

I thought Black lives mattered


24 posted on 07/19/2017 12:53:56 PM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lera

Read about that years ago.


25 posted on 07/19/2017 1:10:47 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

[[I thought being a homo was a major sin in the Muslim religion.]]

They don’t consider a grown man raping a little a boy homosexual relationship


26 posted on 07/19/2017 2:29:06 PM PDT by Lera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

“I thought being a homo was a major sin in the Muslim religion.”

Under sharia, a boy does not count as male until he has grown pubic hair. Before that, it is permissible for men to have sex with them (no minimum age at all). This exception was established by Muhammad himself (as an incentive for certain individuals to join his raiding parties), so it is difficult to avoid in almost any interpretation of sharia.

Young boys for sex slaves has been a significant part of the muslim slave trade ever since Muhammad, and muslims by far have dominated the worldwide slave trade ever since. The majority of slaves that went to European colonies in the New World were purchased at muslim-owned slave markets in West African ports.


27 posted on 07/19/2017 2:59:03 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I thought being a homo was a major sin in the Muslim religion.

Defining a homo as a man who loves men, it is. If it is just loveless release, a bit of fun, no problem. Satan's "religion" does not take kindly to love.

The amoral who would stick anything anywhere if it might feel good are off Allah's hook.

Please note that I do not consider homosexual lust "love", so don't shoot the messenger.

28 posted on 07/19/2017 3:07:16 PM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

You are exactly right. That is the distinction. Still, I have to find that article.


29 posted on 07/19/2017 3:23:02 PM PDT by samtheman (As an oil exporter, why would the Russians prefer Trump to Hillary? (Get it or be stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: caww

“Afghanistan men haven’t a clue what intimacy with women is about”

People are still people, so relationships vary quite a bit, on a case by case basis.

In about half of Afghan marriages, they are first cousins. Often they have known each other well through their whole childhood. I know some where the wife can bat her eyelashes and get pretty much whatever she wants from her smitten husband. In many cases though, there are poorly adjusted men (orphans, child rape survivors, traumatized war survivors, bisexuals who prefer men, etc.) who are emotionally dysfunctional.

People often forget the magnitude and extent of the disasters that the Afghans have been through - anyone of which you would expect to produce psychological damage. They fought the Third World War against the Soviet Union that we prepared for. They suffered through a Khmer Rouge like (Khalq) dictatorship before that. They had years of Mad Max chaos after the Soviets, with gangs and militias ruling the roads, and fighting street to street in the capital city for years, with tanks and cannons. And then they had the Taliban take over with Pakistani support. Child Soldiers, mass executions, horrific torture, famine, mass migration, ethnic cleansing, family/tribal/societal collapse.


30 posted on 07/19/2017 3:23:27 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: Signalman

Not if you are dominant, have a wife at home, and don’t get caught in public doing it. I would guess that the dominant guy exposes his own partner for many of the executions in the Middle East.


32 posted on 07/20/2017 3:58:42 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Isn’t posting Stormfront links forbidden here?


33 posted on 07/20/2017 6:35:50 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I’ll ask the moderator to delete my post and re-post without it.


34 posted on 07/20/2017 7:15:24 AM PDT by samtheman (As an oil exporter, why would the Russians prefer Trump to Hillary? (Get it or be stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

>>Not sure that the demented moonscape that is Afghanistan can ever be brought into the civilized world.

Nepalm the Opium fields.

See which way that brings what.


35 posted on 07/20/2017 9:49:55 AM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/999994/posts

The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | October 4, 2001 | Jamie Glazov

Posted on 10/12/2003, 8:09:43 PM by abu afak

The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror By Jamie Glazov FrontPageMagazine.com, October 4, 2001


36 posted on 07/20/2017 10:40:09 AM PDT by samtheman (As an oil exporter, why would the Russians prefer Trump to Hillary? (Get it or be stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Not sure that the demented moonscape that is Afghanistan can ever be brought into the civilized world.


Without considering either alternative as “civilized world”, I have thought many times over the years that both Carter and Reagan were wrong to oppose the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

I understand Reagan’s motivation... a tool to be used to win the Cold War... which he won. (I have no idea as to the muddled thoughts that may have motivated muddled Carter.)

But just from the point of view of the Afghan people, especially Afghan women living in the cities, they were MUCH better off with an iron-heeled Soviet Socialist regime than with the towel-head, tar-brained islamic savages they normally have running things in that sad, sad country.


37 posted on 07/20/2017 10:47:49 AM PDT by samtheman (As an oil exporter, why would the Russians prefer Trump to Hillary? (Get it or be stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
Well I wasn't speaking about "relationship"..I was however speaking of 'Intimacy' in how Afghanistan men view and approach their women.

As for the wars they've been through.....lets not forget that they have constantly shown to have their own 'tribal' wars which have kept them in a state of conflict.....they have been a conflict nation for decades from within and from without.....none of which 'excuses' their mindset and approach to their women....they have known better when you look at the nation in the 50's 60's and 70's.

38 posted on 07/20/2017 11:10:40 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson