Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/17/2017 12:11:09 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Altura Ct.

Guess the left will have nothing to talk about, since opening their mouths is ‘hate speech’...


2 posted on 07/17/2017 12:12:20 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

A long time ago, my Mama taught me to say, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never harm me.”

Common sense, right?


3 posted on 07/17/2017 12:12:59 PM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

4 posted on 07/17/2017 12:18:38 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.
Barrett believes she offers a scientific rationale for “which kinds of controversial speech should and shouldn’t be acceptable on campus and in civil society. In short, the answer depends on whether the speech is abusive or merely offensive.” The latter has no adverse physical effects, but what she calls abusive speech triggers “the kind of stress that brings on illness and remodels your brain. That’s also true of a political climate in which groups of people endlessly hurl hateful words at one another, and of rampant bullying in school or on social media. A culture of constant, casual brutality is toxic to the body, and we suffer for it.”

Any standard that allows the listener to define the parameters of what a speaker may say is inherently anti free speech. The limits of free speech are, essentially, that one may not say something that is intended to cause actual, physical harm to the BODY of the person who hears it. One cannot yell "fire" in a crowded theater, unless there is actually a fire.

By defining "violent" speech as speech that causes an emotional reaction by the listener, this person explicitly endorses the repeal of all free speech rights in the country. I am certain she has never looked up the word "unalienable".

5 posted on 07/17/2017 12:19:02 PM PDT by MortMan (Adoption is God's grace in human action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

Another commie goal achieved.


6 posted on 07/17/2017 12:19:13 PM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever! “Laughing my #Ossoff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.
The Left's Next Step: Redefining 'Hate Speech' as Violence

I believe that's already happened, at Evergreen State College. The students who took over the campus, kicked all white people off, and caused the whole school to be shut down early (and possibly permanently) defined anyone who disagreed with them as guilty of "hate speech," and then defined "hate speech" as "violence."

This gave them justification to set up roving patrols of minority and LGBT students who armed themselves with bats, knives, and clubs. Campus police were told to stand down and not intervene.

Then a mysterious phone call came in to the local 911 line, on which an apparently male voice stated that he was going to bring a gun to campus and murder as many people as he could find there. After that, the semester was basically called off and school ended early this year.

Their graduation ceremony was moved to Cheney Stadium in Tacoma "for security reasons."

7 posted on 07/17/2017 12:21:54 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.
"speech that bullies & torments" pretty accurately characterizes the rhetoric of the Clinton & Obama Administrations. These loons never seem to see themselves as what they attribute to others.

The Left's war on reality will apparently continue for at least a little longer. We must not let it regain the upper hand, which made the Clinton & Obama nightmares possible.

8 posted on 07/17/2017 12:23:21 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

while there can be such a thing as abusive speech that bullies and torments, it is far far far far far rarer than the socalled left wants us to believe

what they like to do is create “needs” for more and more governmental usurpation of power ... while reducing the citizens to subjects and then dependents and then eventually just slaves of the State


9 posted on 07/17/2017 12:24:12 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

This is 1984/Bravo New World Dystopian society come to fruition. It’s Stalinist Russia and Hitler’s Germany.

Hate Crimes are another joke. I can hate you all I want. It’s my right to hate you. If I beat you up, murder you or destroy your property the crimes must be battery, murder or destruction of property......whether or not I hate you is irrelevant and bogus.


10 posted on 07/17/2017 12:24:49 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

I am not going to be here to satisfy the feelings of pedofreak demands like in the days of Sodom

They all can go ef themselves with their redefinition of violence, rape is still rape, pedophilia is sick


12 posted on 07/17/2017 12:40:28 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

This is the logic of a mass murderer. First, rationalize that some action or behavior on your victims’ part is “equivalent to violence”. Then any actual physical violence that you engage in becomes self-defense, or even a moral obligation.


13 posted on 07/17/2017 12:40:59 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy (rightwingcrazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

“The left” will ALWAYS fine a way to re-define anything to something they think is demeaning. It is a Communist script they read.

Now, for 65 years i have called folks as i see them.

I ain’t about to stop for some marshmellow’s feelings.


15 posted on 07/17/2017 12:47:26 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

The left is trying to bring the U.S. down with hate speech. They are doing this, because Barak and Valerie hate the U.S.

The left owns and practices hate speech.


16 posted on 07/17/2017 12:51:27 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

Violence

VI’OLENCE, noun [Latin violentia.]

1. Physical force; strength of action or motion; as the violence of a storm; the violence of a blow or of a conflict.

2. Moral force; vehemence. The critic attacked the work with violence

3. Outrage; unjust force; crimes of all kinds.

The earth was filled with violence Genesis 6:11.

4. Eagerness; vehemence.

You ask with violence

5. Injury; infringement. Offer no violence to the laws, or to the rules of civility.

6. Injury; hurt.

Do violence to no man. Luke 3:14.

7. Ravishment; rape.

To do violence to or on, to attack; to murder.

But, as it seems, did violence on herself.

To do violence to, to outrage; to force; to injure. He does violence to his own opinions.

VI’OLENCE, verb transitive To assault; to injure; also, to bring by violence [Little used]

(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)


17 posted on 07/17/2017 12:55:18 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.
The Left's Next Step: Redefining 'Hate Speech' as Violence
...and violence as freedom of speech and vice versa.

18 posted on 07/17/2017 1:07:25 PM PDT by Savage Beast (You can drive coast to coast without ever crossing a district run by Democrats! MAGA = Renaissance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.
So if I beat someone up, I can claim we just had a conversation?
It's the same thing right?
If not, then it's not the same thing.

19 posted on 07/17/2017 1:14:17 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.
“speech that bullies and torments” is “literally a form of violence.”

Can we now classify the Quran and Maxine Waters as violence?

20 posted on 07/17/2017 1:22:54 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

Prof. Barrett may think she’s on to another clever ploy to silence the right. But the reality is the real verbal bullies (as well as the actually violent types) are on the left. People on the right would have a field day going after lefty posters who abuse & bully their opponents.


21 posted on 07/17/2017 1:28:13 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.
They attempting to criminalize speech by the law of transitivity (flawed in this case):

Hate speech = violence

Violence = crime

Therefore, hate speech = crime

22 posted on 07/17/2017 3:19:30 PM PDT by matt1234 (Jan. 20, 2017: the national nightmare ended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altura Ct.

Islam has a powerful effect on your nervous system. It may intentionally lead to your death if you are not an adherent of specific versions of Islam. Now am I to go to jail for the above two sentences? I never really thought of, “look out, he is trying to kill you” as hate speech.


23 posted on 07/17/2017 3:27:45 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson