Posted on 07/10/2017 8:14:12 AM PDT by Zakeet
Asking transgender people if they have underdone genital mutilation surgery or if they are just run-of-the-mill crossdressers is now a "microaggression."
A "nonbinary Ph.D. candidate" using the pseudonym Francis Walker discovered this new, menacing microaggression and added it to the worlds perpetually growing stockpile by way of a 1,245-word essay at Inside Higher Ed.
[Snip]
"One of the most common examples of a cissexist microaggression is asking a transgender person if they have had the surgery," Walker explains. "The question implies that there is only one surgery (not true), that the surgery is the only way the person can be recognized as a 'real' woman or man (also not true) and that the individual asking the question has the right to ask and know about the transgender person's genitals (obviously not true)."
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
... you Freepers have no right to ask and know about their genitals ...
War is upon us.
Act accordingly.
It’s getting to the point where a micro-aggression may just have to be replaced with a good, old-fashioned macro-aggression.
Asking them? That is assuming that any sane person would engage in a conversation with the crazy bastards. Just because that SOB is crazy doesn’t mean the rest if us want to be “in” on their fantasy world.
“You have no right to know about my genitals!”, it said,
waving them about in front of everyone.
Can these people act like adults? Look at them - sport their lips, act trashy, dazzy hair, tattoos, goofy caps, weird colored lips. This is ‘mainstream’? I’m to understand all this and accommodate?
They are a macro aggression against humanity!
“...surgery is the only way the person can be recognized as a ‘real’ woman or man...”
The ONLY way to tell if a person is a “real” man or a “real” woman is to check their chromosomes...
XY is a “man”
XX is a “woman”...
The only way to avoid trouble is to avoid people and places.
I read an article recently by a transsexual activist. And he she it whatever it wants to be called, said that people were too focused on what he/she/it has going on in the crotch. Why are so many people focused on the crotch, this person lamented. Even in liberal New York City, where it lives, it gets these questions from otherwise liberal friends and neighbors.
I suppose calling them a sick freak to their face would qualify as a Macro aggression?
Who cares what they think? No more lunatics running the narrative.
From the 2017 Liberal Handbook:
A. Speaking to some sexually confused pervert is now a crime because it’s not nice to question someone’s personal choice of sexual identification and you should just know better and you probably voted for Trump, you backwards neanderthal racist sexist POS.
B. Not speaking to some sexually confused pervert is now a crime because that’s excluding them based upon their non-sex, or sort-of-sex or sex-of-choice or whatever and you should just know better and you probably voted for Trump, you backwards neanderthal racist sexist POS.
And if I ask them if they have had years of intensive mental therapy to address their sick and perverse mental illness - is that a MACRO aggression?
I only hope I never get close enough to one of them to ask.
I want to know if you identify someone as transgender and they’re straight (just fugly), is *THAT* a crime or do they first have to be LGBTQFEIEIO first to have a grievance?
IOW, are you safe if you *assume* the person is transgendered and are only in trouble if you don’t or can the problem be had in reverse?
If so, then the only recourse is to skip pronouns altogether and identify as “this person” or “that person” to be safe.
Also if someone is male but is dressed as a woman, is it okay to condense the phrase “male lady” into “malady”?
Sad thing is, no one is protecting the rights of the majority. Eventually, chromosome tests will be needed to test potential mates of heterosexuals especially for those who wait till marriage to have sex.
It’s a valid question because MOST of these freaks are merely “expressing” a “gender” different from their own - cross dressers. They’re even covered in many “non-discrimination” ordinances.
"One of the most common examples of a cissexist microaggression is asking a transgender person if they have had the surgery,"
Is pointing out basic human reproductive biological FACT a "micro" or a "macro" agression?
XX + XX = FAIL
XY + XY = FAIL
XX + XY = Human
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.