Trump Colludes with Poland

President Trump’s speech to the Polish people wasn’t quite President Ronald Reagan telling Mikhail Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall, but in setting the tone for what may be called the “Trump Doctrine” it may be equally important in a historical context. It was not an apology but a full-throated declaration of American exceptionalism and a shared interest with loyal allies, such as Poland, to resist tyranny and terror in all its forms.

Trump was also speaking to both Vladimir Putin and Germany’s Angela Merkel. Poland is a NATO member that, unlike Germany, has met its NATO commitments. It is also a country that has refused to adopt the European Union’s suicidal policy of open borders. As Reuters reported:

Poland may be the poster child for extreme vetting. Poland does not accept refugees. Poland also has been devoid of terror attacks spawned in the refugee enclaves that dot the major cities of Europe.

Zeneta, read the article all you like.

What you fail to grasp is that the headline is negative and you have to go deep into the article to even come half-way to what you are trying to assert.

At no point does this article declare that Trump is not colluding after all.

What part of this do you not get?

What I’m trying to Assert?

Seriously?

Of course the headline is negative.

Who the f88k cares.

And I hope Trump IS colluding with Poland and anyone else that maintains Judeo/Christian values.

It’s the MSM that calls that evil.

You may need to go back to your dictionary.

This is my first post on this thread:

- - - - -

to Collude LINK

To collude is to do something with evil intent.

I wish our side would quit slipping in insults, whether intended or not.

3 posted on 7/8/2017, 1:38:13 PM by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)

- - - - -

You and I both believe that what the United States and Poland have agreed to do, is a good thing. For that reason, claiming that they "colluded" is a false statement. It is a mis-representation.

As of this posting, you still have NOT been able to grasp that point. Why is that important?

It is important, because the use of the word "Colludes" casts their combined efforts as something evil. Do you think what they are doing is evil? I don't think you do. None the less, you still can't grasp that American Thinker used a term that would ultimately cast their actions as evil, and that of the U.N. and the E.U. (advocating open borders) as the right path. If the U.S. and Poland are doing something diametrically opposite of what the U.N. and the E.U. advocate, then using the term collude to describe that, would mean that the U.N. and the E.U. were the righteous party.

Use the link to read what "Collude" means. It means to team up for evil purposes.

As of your last post, you actually stated you hoped they would team up for evil purposes, by saying you hoped they would collude.

This is the English langauge. Each word has meaning. Why would you want to express a hope that the U.S. and Poland would team up for evil purposes? You wouldn't!

Yes, we both hope they team up for righteous purposes. That's all I have been trying to get through to you.

So far you've favored defending your position rather than admitting Ameircan Thinker screwed up here by using a negative term to describe what the U.S. and Poland are up to.

Collude is not the right word, and those who know the meaning of collude will see it as describing the U.S. and Poland sharing evil purposes.

Surely you don't care for them being cast that way.

And where is G-d in all this?

Here; have a tidbit...

Columbus felt that Almighty God had directly brought about his journey: “With a hand that could be felt, the Lord opened my mind to the fact that it would be possible . . . and he opened my will to desire to accomplish that project. . . . The Lord purposed that there should be something miraculous in this matter of the voyage to the Indies. ”

There may be many things we don't know about history’s most famous mariner. We don't know exactly what Columbus looked like. We don't know the precise design of his three ships. And most bizarre of all, we don't know—and will probably never know—the spot where he came ashore.

But we know beyond doubt that Columbus sailed, in part, to fulfill a religious quest. Columbus’s voyages were intense religious missions. He saw them as the fulfillment of a divine plan for his life—and for the soon-coming end of the world. As he put it in 1500, “God made me the messenger of the new heaven and the new earth of which he spoke in the Apocalypse of St. John [Rev. 21:1] after having spoken of it through the mouth of Isaiah; and he showed me the spot where to find it. ”

https://www.christianhistoryinstitute.org/magazine/article/why-did-columbus-sail/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Really?

Here; have a tidbit...