This is a great article.
Not only didn’t “17 agencies” investigate the case, the three that supposedly did never looked at the DNC server.
And still haven’t.
No evidence, no case. This should have been over long ago. Were the MSM not so intent on spinning lies to undermine a President they detest, it would have been.
How convenient the DNC servers will not be investigated.
It might just show Seth Rich was the leaker.
Does this mean Trump and others don’t have to co-operate either?
#AwanBrothers #SethRich
It’s really hard to find a hacker when the problem is a leaker.
The average American is waiting for the presstitutes to tell them the truth instead of looking at the facts and reaching a reasonable conclusion.
The RATS are now caught in a trap that they themselves sprung.
Can it be used as evidence and placed under 5th amendment protection? DNC shouldn’t quality as classified so why wasn’t there a warrant and agents kicking in a door? Even now? I think they have gotten away with it.
Pivotal to this story is that the Russians gave Wikileaks the DNC/Podesta emails, but Wikileaks founder Julian Assuage, love him or hate him, he has never lied and has denied this. Clapper and his crew is another story, however.
None of the intel agencies ever actually examined the DNC server, but a DNC connected security firm Crowd Strike did.
For sure Russia did try to influence the election but there is a good chance Russia DID try to influence the election but they did so to help HILLARY get elected, not Trump.
The people whom you have evidence of illegality on are the ones that you TRY to get elected. For example, China-Clinton. The Trump-Russian narrative doesn’t support this.
None of the deleted or damaging Hillary emails besides DNC or Podesta ones have surfaced suggesting people that have them like the FBI or enemies want to leverage them.
Didn’t she delete over 30,000 of them? I am going out on a limb her but I think Russia HAS these deleted emails. If they were trying to damage her, why didn’t they leak them?
But think of other Russian interests.
They would like us to remove tactical nukes from Europe.
They would like us to let the military deteriorate.
They would like us to NOT develop our energy resources. A drop in oil price would have a massive impact on Russia economically.
They would not want us to build up our military intelligence.
They would not want us to develop our military technology.
They would not want us to be secure from terrorist attacks.
On each and every one of these issues, the candidate the Russians would NOT want to get elected would be Donald Trump.
I think most people who believe this story was falsified by a politicized intel community instinctively know this, but I think it is worthwhile to state it unequivocally.
Also, who do you think Russia thought would GET elected?
Almost all news including Fox thought Hillary had an 85% or higher chance. Putin doesn’t have his own people taking polls so he relies on ours.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to get the goods on her and wait until she is elected before rocking the boat?
You know, if they weren’t lying out their asses (and probably covering up Arkancide) all they would have to do to demonstrate who hacked their computer was to let it be properly examined. Or so I’ve heard claimed when looking for traces that hackers leave.
bookmark
Probably evidence of voter fraud on it.
They were lying about the hack. There was no hack.
Of course those files were secure! Podesta got the pop-up that said “Your files are in danger! Submit your password and click the “Secure Files” box to guarantee secrecy.” He did so, thus it wasn’t his fault.
If you went to the police and said your car was burglarized and the thieves stole $1,000 in cash, but placed the car where detectives could never examine it — how much interest would the police have in your burglary story?
Hey FBI, you dumb asses, do you understand the words S-U-B-P-O-E-N-A and W-A-R-R-A-N-T?
Oh, I forgot. Jeff Sessions is Attorney General.
We can't just subpoena the DNC's hard drive....I mean.....it involves "Russia" and all of that..
You see...Crowd Strike said so....and I have to abide by what they and the DNC order me to say.....
I must Recuse myself, and once again apologize......the server is off limits.......
What agency has sufficient credibility to perform an honest examination of the server? Who would believe that it had not been tampered with in the meantime? I assume that Crowdstrike’s primary job was cleanup. Hillary and the Dems are experts at drowning the truth in muddy water.
The press should blame the DNC, not CrowdStrike. But, it’s not like the press is fair.
So, if Obama knew that Russia was trying to help Trump get elected and Trump was colluding before the election, why did he do nothing? Has there ever been another case in political electoral history where a political party saved their mud to sling at their opponent until after they lost?
I guess these people really are as stupid as we think.