Skip to comments.Psychologist: Women Don’t Want Pajama Boys
Posted on 06/28/2017 4:09:03 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: This is a website called Intellectual Takeout. Snerdley, pay attention. Youll like this. Headline: Clinical Psychologist: Women Hate Harmless Men. You know, every so often, folks, these stories cross our proverbial desk here. Every six months or so you get a story about male-female relationships of the day and how theyve changed, you know, what men look for in women today versus 20 years ago, 30 years ago, and vice versa.
And we have another one today from a clinical psychologist claiming his name is Jordan Peterson is the clinical psychologist, professor of psychology University of Toronto. Hes a popular speaker, it says here. And it starts by saying: Many modern men have been propagandized to believe that modern women want nice, sensitive, empathetic guys who make them feel safe.
Pajama boys. They want skinny, look like they rarely eat, young, youthful, no acne pimples or zits kind of guys that are totally deferential to womens issues and traits. In other words, they understand that women are feminists and that women are whatever. And this guys point is that those men women actually hate. They might look like they like them, but they dont actually, when you get down to making a choice, thats not who women want to choose. And if women do, its because they are the alpha in the relationship.
Many modern men have been propagandized to believe that modern women want nice, sensitive, empathetic guys who make them feel safe. And then they are perplexed and frustrated when they eventually find themselves dumped, divorced, or relegated to the friend-zone for perpetuity. According to Jordan Peterson such results are not surprising. When he spoke to a gathering of people earlier this year, his thoughts on what women really want in a man supported a stereotype that still has popular cachet: that women are attracted to Well, I cant use the word here. Its a bodily orifice. Ill say butt holes.
This is something actually that has never changed. Im telling you, it has never changed. This is not new. Whatever this guys earth-shattering research is, this isnt new. I simply ask you to remember your high school days. How many of what you thought were the classy women were fascinated by the neer-do-wells, the bikers, the near-gang members, the renegades, the longhaired, greasy-haired, leather-jacket, telling everybody to go to hell kind of guy. It always perplexed a lot of guys my age. They thought women wanted sophisticated, clean cut, polite. That went to hell out with feminism, but even before that happened, do you remember those days, Snerdley? Brian, was that your High School? It was. It was.
Not every woman, but with the popular babes, the scuzzier the better. Exactly right. It was almost like making a statement going out with the scuz, the king scuz guy in school. You know, some guys gonna take you to the movie and hes gonna trash the concession stand when you go in because they dont have enough popcorn and shes gonna look on with pride. That kind of guy.
Now, theres a bit of hyperbole here in the stereotype, admittedly. But he goes on to make the case here. Its been really interesting for me to watch the response of young Caucasian males to hip-hop. You know, theres an aggressiveness about hip-hop thats really attractive to young Caucasian males. And theres something absurd about the spectacle of the young Caucasian males taking on the persona of inner-city black gang members.
You know how you can recognize this? They run around trying to talk like Eminem. What up, yo? Its just part of the persona. Women dont even like harmless men; they hate them. They like to claw them apart. What women want are dangerous men who are civilized. Were not talking about guys that are not civilized; dont misunderstand. Were not talking about people that dont know how to use a knife and fork. Dangerous, risk-taking guys who are civilized and do not mind by the way, every time Ive mentioned this, I have been excoriated.
George Gilder was thrown off The Oprah show for making this point. Ill never forget it. Oprah actually threw George Gilder, a noted socialist and political scientist, off the show because he was trying to credit women for being a primary civilizing factor in the lives of men. And that just offended Oprah (imitating Oprah), You think theres our role, to civilize a bunch of and she was so offended she literally threw him off the show. I think its the only guest she actually asked to leave the stage during the show. She was so righteously indignant.
What women want are dangerous men who are civilized; and they want to help civilize them. The old Beauty and the Beast thing. And then the guy makes this point. How many of you know what a Harlequin Romance is? Do you know what that is? Yeah? Did you read one? Have you ever read a Harlequin Romance? Its a genre. I havent, either, but I know what it is, and I think I know what they purport to be. If you dont, this may not make sense to you, but Im gonna share with you what the guy says anyway.
He told a group, he was addressing them in a speech, an appearance, he said, How many of you know what a Harlequin Romance is? So those are archetypal stories. Thats the taming of the wild man, essentially, by the desirable and virginal woman. And if you think women dont want that then you bloody better well come up with an explanation for Fifty Shades of Grey, which is the most rapid-selling novel in human history, and emerged at exactly the same time as all of this noise about the absence of gender roles is being produced en masse.
Did you see Fifty Shades of Grey, Mr. Snerdley? You read the book? (interruption) You didnt live Fifty Shades of Grey. Dont do that. But the point is this guy says if you dont understand how women loved Fifty Shades of Grey, then you will never understand the point that women are attracted to raconteurs, civilized basket cases, that this idea of wanting a Pajama Boy, thats just for TV commercials. It doesnt happen in the real world. And if it does, its the woman who needs civilizing, not the guy.
And I think that describes Washington, if you want to know the truth. I think women are running that town and have in the media and all over I dont know for how long Ive thought this. Just take a look who the real men of Washington are considered to be.
Some academic did a huge study just the other day —many years and many thousands of women interviewed.
You know what the most common reason is cited by US women initiating (and completing) divorce after age 40..?
Not, not “only *pretending* to listen to me”.
No, not “cheating on me”.
It’s NOT MAKING ENOUGH MONEY.
Just me, but I married an actual man and not some liberal eunuch who’s afraid of guns, chain saws, pickup trucks, hard work, children, and who can’t change a tire.
Those women are called whores.
Even though they only had one customer they were still expecting to get paid for it and thus they are whores.
And theres something absurd about the spectacle of the young Caucasian males taking on the persona of inner-city black gang members.
I don't want a woman with sideburns and a goatee. I don't want a woman I can arm wrestle with. I don't want one who can spit further, swear better, and scratch her balls. I want a feminine woman who is just as comfortable being female as I am being male.
And one who understands that if she insists on me being a gentleman, she'd damn well better be a lady.
I think the dynamic in this post points to two things I’ve noticed:
1. Many white men are interested in Asian women
2. Many white women are interested in black guys
I think feminism teaches men to act a little more womanly and women a little more manly.
And a certain % of honkies of EITHER sex just can’t stand that.
“I need a Hero,
I’m holding out for a hero ‘till the end of the night.
He’s gotta be strong
And he’s gotta be fast’
And he’s gotta be fresh from the fight’
Thank you Bonnie Tyler, for speaking for all intelligent, caring women!
Why would anyone give s*** what women want? I want more ammo, do they care? No.
Manly women want pajama boys....
Interesting to see Limbaugh working Jordan Peterson into his lineup. Been following his summer series of podcasts on the Bible.
Good intro to Jordan Peterson is his recent appearance on Joe Rogan:
Your poor wife.
Gee, ya think? Well, I guess some of the libby womynz might want one for an errand boy or something, but that’s about it.
When picking a husband or a wife, watch how they treat others.
If they are reasoned with others, they’ll generally be reasoned with you.
If they are giving others hell, sooner or later they’ll be giving you hell.
If a guy is too rough and rugged with others, you’re setting yourself up at risk if you are too close to him.
Of course it’s a balancing act, but these are my observations over life.
Watch what they do in relationship with others. If they are kind and reasoned to others, you are probably in good shape.
If they fire off at others, watch out.
Don’t get the idea she’ll give her whole family a terrible time, and think you’ll escape that treatment when you’re a part of her family.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.