1 posted on
06/28/2017 12:40:54 AM PDT by
airedale
To: airedale
no
except in extremely exceptional circumstances
2 posted on
06/28/2017 12:51:51 AM PDT by
vooch
(America First)
To: airedale
3 posted on
06/28/2017 1:10:45 AM PDT by
Dave W
To: airedale
Any settlement or judgement would likely be paid by the company’s errors and liability insurance coverage.
4 posted on
06/28/2017 1:32:20 AM PDT by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: airedale
In a word — no. Suits for damages are limited to monetary remedies.
To: airedale
You can only claim actual damages in cases of defamation. No costs or fees or punitive damages. The best reason for suing a newspaper is to damage their reputation as a reliable and truthful news source.
Of course, as South Park pointed out, she could sue them in England. LOL.
6 posted on
06/28/2017 3:00:54 AM PDT by
SeeSharp
To: airedale
no NYT can pay however they see fit.
8 posted on
06/28/2017 3:53:48 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: airedale
It would be interesting if Sarah owned controlling share of NYT
9 posted on
06/28/2017 4:45:11 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: airedale
Considering how just about every outlet of the MSM took part in anti-Sarah defamations, lawsuits like this one could keep her busy for the rest of her life.
10 posted on
06/28/2017 4:57:48 AM PDT by
Berosus
(I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
To: airedale
11 posted on
06/28/2017 5:24:35 AM PDT by
nwrep
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson