Posted on 06/23/2017 10:05:19 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Perhaps. But, still, let me try:
Climate Change is a fraud committed by political activists who seek to weaken the US and redistribute wealth on a global level by manufacturing and lying about scientific evidence. The POTUS understands this and shut off your gravy train.
Whew! Look at that! I managed to find a different interpretation. Wasn't that hard, Mr. Brilliant Scientist.
“Pruitt’s choice to destroy carefully vetted scientific information...”
Overt lie there.
Fake news.
They ignore the real point.’
No one argues that the climate does not change.
We argue that man can’t control it, and attempts to do so will be wasteful, futile and perhaps dangerous.
Specializing in “climate science” is sort of like specializing in “political science,” i.e. science driven by your politics?
True, and computer models ( what all the "climate change" is based upon) are not evidence. All the actual evidence ( real data ) points away from global warming.
science is not about belief — it’s about evidence
You need data that supports your hypothesis. There is NONE! The problem is that all the models presented to support claims of Climate Change have all been WRONG.
This Analyst is a Propagandist.
“Declaration of war”
What a childish thing to write.
Exactly - you did work, you got paid. We’re tossing it. Want it for your basement??
Jason, it's not the Same now.
LOL, well done. Another leftist there presuming to lay down the law. Funny how they find all kinds of interpretations for marriage, what sex a person is, etc, but their beliefs can only be intrepreted one way, their way.
Fortunately, their army is mostly armed with dildos and bongs.
Declaration of War? Do you really want to go there?
Time for this boy to put up or shut up.
Science? Yeah, political science. Junk science. Anti-America, anti-capitalism propaganda. Free economies must die. Socialism rules!
“Pruitt’s choice to destroy carefully vetted scientific information...”
Removing pages from a website does not “destroy” the information. It just isn’t available at that specific URL anymore. I’m sure this guy’s climate knowledge is as lacking as his computer knowledge. Wonder what the “careful” vetting process was like...if it questions climate change at all it gets rejected, if it suggests that we need massive government intervention and transfer of wealth to ‘save the planet’ it gets accepted.
Well played sir!
>>>Fortunately, their army is mostly armed with dildos and bongs<<<
They make a combo, it’s called a Bonglo.
Is it lost on anybody that he went from working for the government to working for the Washington Post? From leaker to paid employee.
Heck I have had projects go pear shaped. Feels bad, but you get paid and try again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.