Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sailors are abandoning the navy's new warship because they are bored, it is claimed (Royal Navy)
The Telegraph ^ | 6 JUNE 2017

Posted on 06/06/2017 6:18:40 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The Navy's delayed new aircraft carrier is facing a morale crisis, it has been claimed, as sailors 'abandon ship' because they are bored.

In the last few weeks, around 21 sailors have quit aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth - the largest and most powerful warship ever built for the Royal Navy - amid claims morale has dropped "to an all-time low".

A "continuous line" of personnel are reportedly resigning from the £3.1 billion ship - which has not yet begun sea trials originally planned for the spring - because of "dull" conditions onboard.

Around 21 sailors are reported to have quit the HMS Queen Elizabeth in recent weeks CREDIT: ANDREW MILLIGAN/PA WIRE

It has been claimed sailors are being forced to work longer hours and weekends without rest and people aren't being released to go on resettlement courses prior to leaving the navy as they can't be replaced.

Sailors wishing to change jobs within the navy have also had applications to leave the ship declined and are therefore resigning from the force entirely to pursue careers elsewhere.

A retired commander said setbacks to projects onboard have impacted morale and said sailors' lives would be be "dull" and they will be "getting fed up and depressed" while living onboard in Rosyth, Scotland.

The resignations have led to senior officers on the ship, which has had a crew of 700 on board since May 2016, speaking with those quitting to find out why and what lessons can be learnt.

The impressive 65,000-ton carrier, capable of carrying up to 40 aircrafts, is due to begin sea trials this summer before it completes its first voyage to its home in Portsmouth, Hampshire, in autumn. It had been due to undertake sea trials in the spring.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: hmsqueenelizabeth; royalnavy; warship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki

I thought ‘boredom’ was going to mean about 70% of the preferred jobs are now being done by computer or robotic systems. Having your transfer application denied w/o explanation can lead to intense frustration, which is very similar to boredom.


21 posted on 06/06/2017 6:43:31 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Too many females?

Females make everything cool seem childish.


22 posted on 06/06/2017 6:44:43 PM PDT by donna (There are now roughly 3,200 mosques in America, nearly three times as many as there were in 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Make em clean out that padeyes! THAT will make them enjoy their boredom!


23 posted on 06/06/2017 6:47:38 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals are in a state of constant cognitive dissonance, which explains their mental instability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

You sir are a genius! Add to that lack of enough USB ports.


24 posted on 06/06/2017 6:48:16 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett

When the mission is not kill people and break things...


25 posted on 06/06/2017 6:49:29 PM PDT by ebshumidors
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Bring back Rum and The Lash. I’m sure Sodomy is already present...


26 posted on 06/06/2017 6:51:09 PM PDT by farming pharmer (www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Argentina welcomes this news.


27 posted on 06/06/2017 6:52:12 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Hack-proof tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

No one else has nuclear carriers.

A few others have nuclear subs.


28 posted on 06/06/2017 6:56:43 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

European navies have never placed the importance on range that the USN does. They generally don’t have to worry about traversing the Pacific.


29 posted on 06/06/2017 6:57:27 PM PDT by chb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Nuclear surface ships are a joke and a waste of money. An exotic way to boil water. A conventional carrier has the exact same capabilities as a nuclear carrier.


30 posted on 06/06/2017 7:03:47 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

All US full size carriers are nuclear.

A submarine that is non nuclear is not a full time submersible. WW 2 technology.


31 posted on 06/06/2017 7:05:00 PM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Same as it ever was.

Classic SNL

“Port of Call.....Bayonne, New Jersey........”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhioeOeOHsA


32 posted on 06/06/2017 7:06:51 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

A 30 year fuel supply is not a waste of money. How much oil would be used on a giant carrier in 30 years.


33 posted on 06/06/2017 7:07:43 PM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Between the initial cost, the increased crew training needed and the dangers of damage control on a nuclear reactor there is not much difference.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Nuclear Power for Navy Surface Ships

34 posted on 06/06/2017 7:12:37 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: central_va

My understanding was that nuclear powered USS carriers can go 5 years without refueling.

That right there would make it very different than a conventionally powered carrier.


35 posted on 06/06/2017 7:30:13 PM PDT by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Are there girls aboard this tub?


36 posted on 06/06/2017 7:30:28 PM PDT by batterycommander (I learned my Artillery skills from the United States Marines. USNA 65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Are there girls aboard this tub?


37 posted on 06/06/2017 7:30:47 PM PDT by batterycommander (I learned my Artillery skills from the United States Marines. USNA 65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Bring back the daily ration of rum.


38 posted on 06/06/2017 7:35:36 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

The CVN is 50% more expensive to build. It requires MUCH more training for the crew. Port visits are a problem because nobody wants them. Knowing what I know about naval damage control, nuclear surface ships are suicide traps in wartime.


39 posted on 06/06/2017 7:36:16 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I read and understood every word . . . in the headline.


40 posted on 06/06/2017 8:08:52 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Operation Covfefe is now in effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson