Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

My understanding was that nuclear powered USS carriers can go 5 years without refueling.

That right there would make it very different than a conventionally powered carrier.


35 posted on 06/06/2017 7:30:13 PM PDT by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bone Texan

The CVN is 50% more expensive to build. It requires MUCH more training for the crew. Port visits are a problem because nobody wants them. Knowing what I know about naval damage control, nuclear surface ships are suicide traps in wartime.


39 posted on 06/06/2017 7:36:16 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson