Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]Dear Administrator Jackson:
I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."
It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.
The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.
Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.
We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden's letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)
So the Journalism major goes up against the Medical doctor debating science.
Sort of not a contest, is it?
Rand Paul is correct. According to these so-called experts, snow was supposed to end in London by 2010 and the Himalayan Mountain ice caps were supposed to melt by 2015.
Well, it still snows in London and those ice caps are still there. Don’t even get me started on the supposed demise of the polar bear.
There are a number of studies which refute Climate Warming including this:
There is no denying climate change since climate has been in a state of change since Creation, thanks to mother nature and the sun.
Wrong premise. “Climate change” is a continually morphing issue that changes to whatever the rabid left wants it to mean. How convenient.
I hope Rand and Trump can put some of the primary stuff behind them and work to make america great again, and signs look good that is happening!
The idiot kept baiting Rand Paul into saying NASA is wrong - as if it matters.
Yes, some scientists at NASA could be wrong.
All of it has happened?
Has he not seen the list of top 50 predictions that didn’t come true about global warming?
what a d###
Tapper and his audience thinks the models are made of plastic.
Tapper disagreed, claiming about the predictions: “all of it has happened.”
So there’s no more polar ice?
Which is more ignorant, believing in Manmade Globull Warming or believing that Man could reverse it if it actually existed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGshOVzVOEg
video at link
There was a story a year or two ago about an Australian mathematician that found several errors in the computer models used for globull warming. The media of course has buried it, but it’s still got to be out there somewhere. But basically the models were way off due to these errors.
Rand Paul destroyed that elitist.
Step 1 in arguments with libs - Go after their character