Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Creep of Neo-Marxist/Postmodernism Gets Called Out At Harvard
Facebook/YouTube ^ | 5/22/17 | Dr. Jordan Peterson

Posted on 05/27/2017 10:28:39 AM PDT by Jim W N

Dr. Jordan Peterson visits Harvard University, where he used to teach, for a civil discussion about neo-marxism and postmodernism, among other topics.

6 minutes of Jordan Peterson addressing the Harvard students directly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGkQil14LPQ

Full conversation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urd0IK0WEWU&t=1916s


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: education; harvard; harvardu; leftismoncampus; neomarxism; peterson; postmodernism
Finally, someone who knows something speaks out at a major university about the lying hypocrisy, utter idiocy, and zero intellectual credibility of the destructive Leftist agenda through neo-Marxism, the women's movement, and activist disciplines in the universities.

I'm amazed Harvard let him speak. I pray God will right our foundering ship of state, culture, and society.

I look for relief from this relentless march of self-destruction here and around the world through a brief resurgence of faith and sensibleness by the grace of God through Jesus Christ. However, at some point later, the 21st Century will become so bloody and deadly, it will make the bloody 20th Century look like a picnic.

1 posted on 05/27/2017 10:28:39 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Six-minute video on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGkQil14LPQ.


2 posted on 05/27/2017 10:33:26 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216
Nat Hentoff (RIP)
Camille Paglia
Jordan Peterson

Not all liberals are Marxist SJW's.

There's hope.

3 posted on 05/27/2017 10:36:29 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

“Amazed that Harvard let him speak” Are you kidding? Neo Marxist post Modernism is the nonsense that dominates the humanities at Harvard and most universities. Real intellectual inquiry and scholarship no longer exists in these politically correct, well funded toxic bubbles.


4 posted on 05/27/2017 10:37:33 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

I fear you are correct.


5 posted on 05/27/2017 10:42:30 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Look at their ages. Postmodern indoctrination is everywhere. Importantly places like Harvard are not the problem. Postmodernism in schools of education are where it hurts society.


6 posted on 05/27/2017 11:05:32 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

That was great. SJWs are pathetic.


7 posted on 05/27/2017 11:20:18 AM PDT by SaraJohnson ( Whites must sue for racism. It's pay day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

For anyone who never heard of it, look up Intersectionality. Truly nutty.


8 posted on 05/27/2017 11:26:52 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

He put it very well - SJW “studies” are void of intellectual credibility.


9 posted on 05/27/2017 11:27:34 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

As he put it so very well - intersectionality “studies” are void of any true scientific inquiry or intellectual credibility.


10 posted on 05/27/2017 11:30:32 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Spectacular. Do you know when this happened?


11 posted on 05/27/2017 11:34:12 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReaganGeneration2

Whatever date is showing. I think it was a few days ago.


12 posted on 05/27/2017 11:35:47 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216
The recent "progressive" notion of what is loosely described as "political correctness," or "sensitivity," is simply censorship by another name, whereby some people, who believe themselves to be superior to their fellows, have assumed a right they do not possess as citizens under the U. S. Constitution.

Such censorship is a crude attempt to shut down political/religious opinions and intelligent discussion, substituting coercive pressure by those who wish no such reasoned debate.

Generations who have been "imprisoned" in schools which failed to teach them of their individual value and purpose under the ideas expressed in their nation's Declaration of Independence and protected under their written Constitution should now be informed that the First Amendment protects their freedom of speech, of expression, and that no "progressive regressive" has a right to censor away that right.

"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson
In her May 26 Commencement Speech, Hillary spoke of what she declared were attacks on "truth and reason." In the current climate, where "progressive" regressives deny students the right to hear, much less to examine and debate, competing ideas, one wonders why she has any real concern about such perceived "attacks."
13 posted on 05/27/2017 11:39:35 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
Congress [the feds] shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. US Constitution, Amendment I.

As you rightfully said, the Constitution codifies the truths of the Declaration of Independence. Our country needs a political and spiritual enema.

BTW, what <...> do you use to indent a passage?

14 posted on 05/27/2017 11:57:22 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

yeah I was impressed by the guy too. he sounded like a real academic.


15 posted on 05/27/2017 2:43:21 PM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Copied and pasted the 6 minute youtube link into the browser.

WOW! HOORAY Jordan Peterson. Thanks for posting, Jim 0216


16 posted on 05/27/2017 4:04:43 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
Let's try this using the blockquote. Worth repeating anyway I think.

As you rightfully said, the Constitution codifies the truths of the Declaration of Independence.

Congress [the feds] shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. US Constitution, Amendment I.
.
17 posted on 05/27/2017 9:20:47 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson