Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

About Those 18 Undisclosed Meetings The Trump Campaign Had With The Russians
Townhall.com ^ | May 18, 2017 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 05/19/2017 8:52:49 AM PDT by Kaslin

Here we go again. We have found more undisclosed meetings with the Russians. That means more mouths will foam. More accusations will fly, though Democrats are about to get rabid again over nothing again, which is always entertaining. The New York Times reported that Trump associates had contact with Russian intelligence officials a year before the election, but there was no evidence of collusion. Some associates, like Paul Manafort, have done business in the country and running into Russian intelligence isn’t unusual. So, nothing came of that. The infamous Russian dossier that was published in full on BuzzFeed was compiled by a former MI6 operative, Christopher Steele, as part of an opposition research project by anti-Trump Republicans, which was later taken over by Democrats. The dossier is unverified. It largely remains uncorroborated. What we do know is that Russian government officials talked to other Russians, but we don’t know what they discussed. Now, there are reports that the dossier itself was a project funded by the Russians. Fusion GPS, which funded the effort, has refused to cooperate with the Senate Judiciary Committee, who sent a letter asking them if they could answer some questions about this project.

There is no solid evidence that the Russians colluded with the Trump campaign during the 2016 election and it remains that way. Reuters reported that the Trump campaign had 18 undisclosed communications with Russian officials during the last seven months of the 2016 elections. Buried in the story: no evidence of collusion (via Reuters) [emphasis mine]:

Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump’s campaign were in contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told Reuters.

The previously undisclosed interactions form part of the record now being reviewed by FBI and congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election and contacts between Trump’s campaign and Russia.

Six of the previously undisclosed contacts described to Reuters were phone calls between Sergei Kislyak, Russia's ambassador to the United States, and Trump advisers, including Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser, three current and former officials said.

[…]

The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far. But the disclosure could increase the pressure on Trump and his aides to provide the FBI and Congress with a full account of interactions with Russian officials and others with links to the Kremlin during and immediately after the 2016 election.

So, there’s nothing wrong. There’s nothing illegal. And there’s nothing improper with these meetings. Associated Press’ Julie Pace also mentioned that there was nothing wrong with the meetings Trump officials had with the Russians.

Nothing’s changed here, folks. There’s still no evidence of collusion. The House and Senate Intelligence committees have also yet to find smoking guns relating to the collusion allegation.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Russia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: sickoflibs; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Impy; stephenjohnbanker

Maxine Waters has her head so far up her own ass she’s looking out her own eyes twice.

They say she got an award for spelling her name right in High School, and actually knowing who her her daddy was that was the second award)...


21 posted on 05/19/2017 2:25:22 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NFHale; sickoflibs; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; Liz; GOPJ

Yeah if she sticks her head far enough up her wazoo she can see Russia.


22 posted on 05/19/2017 3:08:55 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Why didn't the FBI examine DNC servers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The House and Senate Intelligence committees have also yet to find smoking guns relating to the collusion allegation.

That's because they're looking in the wrong places. If any collusion took place, it was in the Hillary campaign. We already know she sold favors to Russia for huge personal profit. It's not that much of a leap to assume she did collude with them to try to sway the election. All of this noise is not about Trump, it's about trying to distract attention from Hillary.

23 posted on 05/19/2017 7:01:47 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NFHale
They say she got an award for spelling her name right in High School, and actually knowing who her her daddy was that was the second award

Bwahahaha, that is about the funnies thing I've ever read, and it's probably true.

24 posted on 05/19/2017 7:23:53 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; NFHale; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; Liz; GOPJ; fieldmarshaldj

Last night on Chris Hayes MSNBC program he and lib guests admitted that there probably was no collusion on the election between Trump campaign and the Russians, but they said that there are many other things the special prosecutor can get them on:

Covering up the non-collusion
Lying about the non-collusion

They always get their man, just ask Scooter!


25 posted on 05/19/2017 7:34:06 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Trump "Mexico will pay for the Wall! Mark my words")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Let’s keep in mind that when people say that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to “hack” “meddle with” or otherwise change the outcome of the election, they are talking about releasing emails that revealed how corrupt and criminal the Democrats are, nothing more.


26 posted on 05/19/2017 7:41:06 PM PDT by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Quite possible. I say that Muller should verify that the Russians actually did something to the DNC servers before proceeding on that assumption, but maybe expecting Muller to do his job is asking too much. We shall see.


27 posted on 05/19/2017 8:13:00 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Why didn't the FBI examine DNC servers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Bingo. No law was broken.

It’s as if democrats were accusing Trump of using mustard ... on his burger. And that Trump used mustard several times before being elected. And admitting using mustard on hot dogs. And the breathless press put in on the front page: Un-named source saw Trump using mustard...

BUT...

It’s NOT against the law to use mustard.

It’s NOT against the law to use mustard.

Get it?

It’s NOT against the law to use mustard.

There is NO CRIME.

That’s where we’re at...it’s like the folks in Washington are nuts.


28 posted on 05/19/2017 8:48:10 PM PDT by GOPJ (The liberal media is the thug arm of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

No law was broken. “Collusion” is NOT possible.

It’s as if democrats were accusing Trump of using mustard ... on his burger. And that Trump used mustard several times before being elected. And admitting using mustard on hot dogs. And the breathless press put in on the front page: Un-named source saw Trump using mustard...

BUT...

It’s NOT against the law to use mustard.

It’s NOT against the law to use mustard.

Get it?

It’s NOT against the law to use mustard.

There is NO CRIME.

That’s where we’re at...it’s like the folks in Washington are nuts.


29 posted on 05/19/2017 8:50:58 PM PDT by GOPJ (The liberal media is the thug arm of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
RE:”No law was broken. “Collusion” is NOT possible.”
.....
There is NO CRIME.”

With a special prosecutor that doesn't matter.

Ever heard Trump change his story (less than three times) ?? Will every one on his campaign remember exactly what they said to anyone else the last year or more?

Things the special prosecutor may get them on:

Covering up the non-collusion
Lying about the non-collusion

What crime did Scooter Libby commit?

30 posted on 05/19/2017 9:04:59 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Trump "Mexico will pay for the Wall! Mark my words")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; sickoflibs; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; Liz; GOPJ

Having a discussion with a cinderblock while drunk would result in a more intellectually stimulating conversation than listening to that stupid batsh*t moron.

I refuse to obey any law passed by morons like her.

Absolute no compliance.


31 posted on 05/19/2017 9:28:36 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

James Brown had better hair. His was real.


32 posted on 05/19/2017 9:46:22 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; Liz; GOPJ; fieldmarshaldj

“...just ask Scooter!...”

Trump ain’t Scooter Libby.

And he’s got a Hell of a lot more money to fight back with than Scooter.


33 posted on 05/19/2017 9:57:20 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

All call

Deep State Private Chat Intercepted, Exposes a Coup Attempt Against America by Intelligence Community Members
http://allnewspipeline.com/Smoking_Gun_Deep_State_Private_Chat.php

https://twitter.com/KibBitzLaw


34 posted on 05/19/2017 10:05:30 PM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! And please, God, bless the USA again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
And lest we lose sight of the REAL issue here...regardless of who leaked the DNC and Hilliary emails to WikiLeaks, they were legitimate emails - not invented or made up - that showed the lowdown dirty actions being taken by them to undermine rivals to HRC and her efforts to illegally hide State Department workings involving the Clinton Foundation. Whoever did the leaking, did America a FAVOR!
35 posted on 05/19/2017 11:15:22 PM PDT by boatbums (Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
B I N G O!
36 posted on 05/19/2017 11:17:47 PM PDT by boatbums (Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Contacts during the primary shouldn't matter because the election doesn't begin until the general election after the parties formally nominate their candidates.

-PJ

37 posted on 05/19/2017 11:25:10 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Overpaid troll: President Trump: Did you use mustard on your hamburger Nov. 8th at dinner?

Trump: No

Overpaid troll: Three ‘sources’ say they say you put mustard on your burger in September.

Trump: Maybe I used mustard... is that a crime?

Overpaid troll: It's not a crime but we're assigning a special prosecutor to find out if you used mustard in November... We'll pull in everything we can find to trash you... You should have written down everything you ate - kept notes - like the DC nut jobs do.

Trump: You people are nuts.

38 posted on 05/20/2017 8:28:36 AM PDT by GOPJ (The liberal media is the thug arm of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kremlin spokesman: Russian ambassador met with advisers to Clinton campaign too http://thehill.com/policy/international/323582-kremlin-spokesman-russian-ambassador-met-with-advisers-to-clinton

RussiaGate: Hillary Clinton and John Podesta’s Troubling Ties to Russia https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/29/russiagate-hillary-clinton-and-john-podestas-troubling-ties-to-russia/

This is all such a joke!


39 posted on 05/20/2017 8:37:55 AM PDT by EBH (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why shouldn’t the coming administration meet with Russians?

I thought that the idea of a rapprochement with Putin’s government to subdue ISIS and advance matters of mutual interest was brilliant and creative.

And even if you disagree, isn’t it the President-elect’s job to create and advance foreign policy?


40 posted on 05/20/2017 8:44:00 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson