Posted on 05/14/2017 4:48:30 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
May 14th, 2017
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Mark Warner, D-Va.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Secretary of State Rex Tillerson; Sens. Linda Graham, R-S.C., and Chuck U. Schumer, D-N.Y.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb.; Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.; former Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Warner; Nikki Haley, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations; James Clapper, former director of national intelligence.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Schumer; Clapper.
They probably were running for their lives (to preserve their sanity)
New Hampshire used to be the big Red-State outpost in New England....now it's Northern Maine.
Only exception I would make is if you took a guy like asst.AG Rod Rosenstein and told him to do anything he needed as long as he finished up in three weeks and got the job done once and for all.
“...and I think that “I” means, too ashamed to call themselves a RAT...”
_______________________________________________________
Not in my case.
In the summer of 2006 I moved from one town here in Maine to another and had to re-register to vote.
At the time, I was disgusted with George W. Bush and his push for amnesty. His “See you at the signing” comment was the last straw, so I registered as an Independent.
In the 25 years I’ve lived in Maine I have never voted for a democrat; always a Republican straight ticket. With two exceptions; I once wrote in the name of my Republican county sheriff instead of voting for Olympia Snowe for U.S. Senate. In 2014, instead of voting for Susan Collins, I wrote in a Republican businessman and former cop I know who previously ran for the state Senator but lost.
Question is which party stays at home more?
I remember election night in 2014 during Maine’s governor’s race.
A commentator on TV said that Gov. Paul LePage actually did better than expected in the Portland area.
Maybe there are pockets of hope in Maine’s 1st Congressional district after all. (I can dream, can’t I?).
Well, if the "unenrolleds" were all like you, conservatives could easily win all the local and legislative elections.
So as an independent....how do you like being bombarded with all that political junk mail, from both sides?
Just for the record, Julian Assange, who published the DNC emails, says A, they were leaked, not hacked, and B, they were leaked by an American who had legal access to them. ( Podesta wasn’t hacked either. He turned over his own password to a phishing scam.)
I do not overlook what Trump has accomplished. Repeal of various Obama agenda items are a major plus. More must be done to allow free enterprise to make this country great again.
However, The Donald has not been able to do a DAMN thing about the LEGISLATIVE B.S. - CROMNIBUS over-rides many of Trump's good deeds.
Trump's RINOCare debacle is just that, a monstrous Socialist/Communist takeover - I do not trust that Congress and Trump will revisit this issue. But I do hope I am wrong.
I would indeed like to have the 17th amendment repealed. Then Texas MIGHT have two Senators who believe in the LIMITED FEDERAL G’ment as defined by the Constitution instead of Just Ted Cruz.
And Maybe Maine would put their Current Governor LePage- an old Curmudgeonly GENTLEMEN into the U.S. Senate instead of the old witch and Where is the Beef Angus.
I just don’t get it - What is wrong with Maine merging back with Mass-holes and both can be called Tax-holes :)
Yes you make sure you get all the Repubs to vote and if you have time go talk to the Indis.
In case anyone missed it. Gates was very good.
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/05/14/robert-gates-agreement-trumps-disruptive-approach/
We haven’t talked any about this today but its a great explanation of what is going on in Syria and other countries where they are exporting young males to other countires as fast a they can. Whats that all about? It’s here:
http://investmentwatchblog.com/this-is-the-real-secret-behind-enforced-mass-migration/
If it seems like governments across the Western world are engaged in a frantic effort to force as many immigrants from less developed countries into American and European cities as possible, it’s because they are. This is not a humanitarian effort; it is not an economic model to ensure that national economies maintain their current GDPs. The truth is far more sinister.
Why is the question never asked – if we take millions and millions of migrants/refugees out of Syria (the Middle East and Africa, too), and as has been suggested, to carry this policy and process on indefinitely, who will be left in those parts of the world?
Time and again we are told that a larger population leads to a better economy. But if nations are “asset-stripped” of their population, surely they will become economic deserts. They will, and this is the whole point. Once there is little or no economic activity left, it will be very easy to encourage the last remnants to move along. With no business, utility infrastructure, education, and just a place-holder government, the final population will have no choice but to migrate. These “wastelands” (still rich in other resources), can then be used as the Globalist overseers wish.
And what of the migrants and the native populations of their host countries? They will be moved into cities which will grow larger and larger. No one will be permitted to live in the countryside because this would entail property ownership by an entity who is not “The State” (just look at what’s happening to farmers all over America today). In 2008/2009, the largest transfer of private property in history took place (non-war related). Homeowners lost their homes to the Banks that were responsible for the crash in the first place (and were subsequently bailed out by the very taxpayers whose homes they were seizing). And what are the banks doing with all of these newly acquired properties and lands? Almost nothing. The majority of these properties are just sitting vacant, being used as assets on a balance sheet. And of course the lack of movement keeps areas economically stagnant.
In the near future, property ownership will be the preserve (and the right) of the few. Millions will live in mega-cities and pay rent (or if not, become a member of the homeless-class, of which there will be hundreds of thousands per city), and their jobs will pay only enough buy necessities from State producers…The wage compression from mass-immigration will see to this.
There will be one central governing body (styled after the European Union which is the prototype), and laws will be regulated and exactly the same in every city across the globe.
This is the real purpose of enforced mass-immigration; and as a byproduct, it is the reason that wars are constantly raging throughout these areas. It is for control structures and ultimately power over each aspect of life. If it seems like a Dystopian story, it is. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t happening right now.
He might just do that...and, he's not "old". (some would say he's no gentleman, born into poverty)
Where is the Beef Angus.
I believe you are referring to Anus King?
I just don’t get it
We can see that.
What is wrong with Maine merging back with Mass-holes and both can be called Tax-holes
Well, that's pretty much what's happened with the first Maine (which tyrannically brutalizes the second Maine)
I don’t know for sure, but it appears that way.
Do not know if this has been posted but I will post it anyway.
Really good.
Should run it on all MSM.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Miami4Trump/status/792098648255500290/video/1
Right now we do it exactly the other way around, but I think your method is correct...modified it would be:
>>Go talk to the Indies, and at the same time make sure you get all the Rs to vote.<<
That would be twice as much work, and hasn't properly been getting done, but probably is exactly what needs to happen to win a majority in the Maine House.
I'll see if I can get some numbers (enrolled vs voted) from the State Committee.
I hate to say this, but what you are talking about here is actually modified (to an honest version) Community Organizing.
He’s for gun control. Not good in an FBI director
30-40-30 last I knew.
I’m just assuming your response is just a sarcastic question for Rhetorical purposes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.