Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Ruh Roh! Key phrase---"But what if CO2 isn’t a pollutant?" IF? Srsly? Despite the SCOTUS saying it is based on that fine panel of scientists, it's natural. No wonder nobody is claiming that they wrote this piece. But, whoever did is steering the anti-denialists towards Brian Sussman so he can take the brunt of the harassment from the ecowankers. Think anyone in the NEA will bother with this report? Nope. Time to further defang the epa.
1 posted on 05/01/2017 6:21:02 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

Just picture Charleton Heston shouting:

“CO2 IS PLANT FOOD! ...IT’S PLANT FOOOOOD!!!!”


2 posted on 05/01/2017 6:27:24 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF OBAMACARE REPEAL THAT IS WORSE THAN KEEPING IT ONE MORE DAY***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

CO2 wasn’t ruled a pollutant in an effort to save mankind or the planet.

CO2 was ruled a pollutant to justify a bigger, stronger, more pervasive Nanny state and to justify massive wealth redistribution.


3 posted on 05/01/2017 6:27:59 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best Long Term Prepper Tactic: Beat The Muslim Takeover - Have Big Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Don’t assume people know the definition of the word “pollutant”.


4 posted on 05/01/2017 6:29:11 AM PDT by gr8eman (Facts and evidence are bourgeois constructs weaponized by patriarchal penis-people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I’m trying to sell my extra large super-duper CO2 scrubbers to the UN - I guarantee that all CO2 will be removed from the atmosphere and all CO2 sources will be permanently sequestered in underground bunkers by whatever means necessary ... all hail Gaia! The Earth will soon be CO2 free!!


5 posted on 05/01/2017 6:30:24 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
To prevent this (Global Warming) catastrophe, a vast regulatory infrastructure needs to be created, even if it means sacrificing jobs, economic efficiency, personal freedoms or national sovereignty itself.

The left-wing professors want Other Peoples Money for their research projects and the Democrats want to control every aspect of our lives. Such a deal.

6 posted on 05/01/2017 6:31:50 AM PDT by libertylover (In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
The researchers claim they could find no evidence that rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations “have had a statistically significant impact on any of the 14 temperature data sets that we analyzed.”

misinterpreted data + dishonesty/lies + simplified dramatic statements + scare tactics/mass hysteria = libtard science

7 posted on 05/01/2017 6:34:41 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
I had to harvest my timber last year due to signs of extreme stress. We figured most of the damage came from four years of drought on the west coast, they were dying.

An alternative theory may be, since the government crack down on CO2, the very food source for my trees, maybe that is what is killing our trees in the NW? A CO2 drought brought on by Obama, the EPA and the Supreme Court!

9 posted on 05/01/2017 6:44:17 AM PDT by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
"Key phrase---"But what if CO2 isn’t a pollutant?" IF? Srsly? Despite the SCOTUS saying it is based on that fine panel of scientists, it's natural."

Any chemical can be a pollutant in the wrong place and/or at the wrong concentration. In the same way that any plant can be a weed for similar reasons. A stalk of corn in a cotton or soybean field is a weed. That said, I think "global warming" is not real.

11 posted on 05/01/2017 6:48:19 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
The level of the so-called “pollutant” carbon dioxide, or CO2, is rising in the atmosphere,

Okay. I'll bite. What has it risen to? Last time I checked I think CO2 made up something like .03% (that's three/one hundredths of a percent for those of you who are decimal-pointly challenged) of our atmosphere.

12 posted on 05/01/2017 6:52:49 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

.....That’s precisely the shocking finding of a new report from statistician Jim Wallace, climatologist John Christy and meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, who contend the Environmental Protection Agency erred when it ruled CO2 is a pollutant in 2009.....

Climatology—real science!

“Climate science”—fake science!!!! You know, all those models!

PHOOEY!!!!


13 posted on 05/01/2017 6:54:04 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

CO2 is 0.04% of Earths atmosphere.


14 posted on 05/01/2017 6:54:18 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Things for the marchers to consider....

Sussman similarly dismissed the recent “March for Science,” not as a defense of scientific but as a “fresh public venue for Trump haters to parade their ignorant nonsense.”...

“The March for Science was a confusing event,” he commented. “It risks associating the term ‘science’ with ‘left-wing politics’ which would ultimately not be good for those who claim a scientific mindset. But what I think is more damaging is the idolization of science. It risks becoming religious with people marching through the streets proclaiming that if we just all looked to science we would find utopia, heaven on Earth.

20 posted on 05/01/2017 7:32:14 AM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The GOVERNMENT SPONSORED SCIENTIST, were also caught placing about a third of their temperature sensors wrongfully over areas with cement on the ground.
This gave false warmer readings due to the cement which is why sensors go over ground.


21 posted on 05/01/2017 7:36:36 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

CO2 is no more a pollutant then O2

Plants take in CO2 and emit O2

Animals take in O2 and emit C02

Its a Beautiful Natural Symbiotic cycle


25 posted on 05/01/2017 8:25:29 AM PDT by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Yea, but... if you fill a bucket with gasoline and light it, it produces some CO2... and if you measure the temperature just above the flame you'll see its warm/hot.

Therefore, the CO2 must be causing warming!

Can I get my government grant now to write this up in a scientific paper? $5 million will get me started.

27 posted on 05/01/2017 9:06:41 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Bookmark


28 posted on 05/01/2017 9:25:24 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson