Posted on 05/01/2017 6:21:02 AM PDT by rktman
The theory of human-caused global warming is straightforward. The level of the so-called pollutant carbon dioxide, or CO2, is rising in the atmosphere, causing a worldwide increase in temperatures that ultimately will have a catastrophic effect on the planet.
To prevent this catastrophe, a vast regulatory infrastructure needs to be created, even if it means sacrificing jobs, economic efficiency, personal freedoms or national sovereignty itself.
But what if CO2 isnt a pollutant?
Thats precisely the shocking finding of a new report from statistician Jim Wallace, climatologist John Christy and meteorologist Joe DAleo, who contend the Environmental Protection Agency erred when it ruled CO2 is a pollutant in 2009.
The researchers claim they could find no evidence that rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations have had a statistically significant impact on any of the 14 temperature data sets that we analyzed.
These analysis results would appear to leave very, very little doubt but that EPAs claim of a Tropical Hot Spot (THS), caused by rising atmospheric CO2 levels, simply does not exist in the real world, the report said.
Brian Sussman, a former meteorologist and the author of Eco-Tyranny: How The Lefts Green Agenda Will Dismantle America, hailed the report as a devastating blow to what he argues is a phony movement.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The GOVERNMENT SPONSORED SCIENTIST, were also caught placing about a third of their temperature sensors wrongfully over areas with cement on the ground.
This gave false warmer readings due to the cement which is why sensors go over ground.
Yep - the plants “eat” the C and return the O so we can thrive too.
No trees! They are carbon sinkls when they are alive, but in death they return all that carbon! Into the sealed underground bunkers with all CO2 emitters ... trees, animals, etc. We will have a clean planet! The more you whine, the more CO2 you emit - so go along with the Plan, its for your own good and of course the planet’s!
Bingo!
CO2 is no more a pollutant then O2
Plants take in CO2 and emit O2
Animals take in O2 and emit C02
Its a Beautiful Natural Symbiotic cycle
the Plant Animal CO2 O2 cycle
seem to confuse to left as much as
male female reproduction cycle
Therefore, the CO2 must be causing warming!
Can I get my government grant now to write this up in a scientific paper? $5 million will get me started.
Bookmark
Yep - I call 'em "trees" for short. Let me know what they offer you.
As I said earlier: No trees! Please! When they die all that CO2 is released back into the Gaia’s precious, sacred environment.
I cannot reveal the nature or origin of my scrubbers, lest people like you steal them and undercut my bid.
The bad, very bad thing about all that was the federal and state income tax, too damn high.
CO2 is approximately o.o4 percent of the earths atmosphere, I don’t think that qualifies it as a pollutant.
If I recall correctly, a pollutant is anything that occurs in a harmful quantity in an environmental system, somebody quick, show me where plant food is harmful to the environment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.