.
A true nut case!
.
Huh? The usual “treatment” for anencephaly is abortion. She decided to carry the baby to term so that even though the baby would die anyway that maybe others could be saved. It is a horrible choice of two bad options.
Just curious....what should they have done differently?
Abort the baby as soon as they found out it was unhealthy?
Deliver the baby and but then not donate it’s organs to another sick baby?
Are you against abortion? If yes, then why do you criticize the mother for not aborting her baby? If the baby is terminal at birth, then what is the harm in donating her organs so others might live?
>>A true nut case!<<
Not the way I read it. What would you have done KNOWING the baby would die immediately post-partum?
The easy decision would have been to just abort and go on with life, like tossing away a dish cloth.
This was a VERY hard road to walk — it involved more pain than I can possibly imagine sustaining.
The Lord blessed these people with an amazing amount of love, generosity and strength.
I am humbled.
“A true nut case!”
What are you talking about? They should have aborted the baby?
“A true nut case!”
What are you talking about? They should have aborted the baby?
The headline is sensational. It’s very misleading. Fake news for sure. A woman finds out she is having a baby without a brain. It will die. Should she donate it’s organs so another baby can live? Of course. It wasn’t conceived in order to harvest it’s organs.
Why???!