Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I have my own supercomputer simulator that I call the ClimOcraper and I get 123%.
1 posted on 04/06/2017 6:46:19 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

Another global warming “study”. We’re all gonna die!!!


2 posted on 04/06/2017 6:47:50 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey Snowflakes! You can't impeach the President of the United States because he makes you feel sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How about a bill to prosecute AGW alarmists?

“If you federal funds to perpetrate a scientific fraud, you’re subject to 10 years in prison and a $100,000 dollar fine.”


3 posted on 04/06/2017 6:48:18 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It must be AGW fake news day


4 posted on 04/06/2017 6:48:25 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Something’s wrong with their model. It’s 149.3721%.

That last .0001% is going to knock my beer off the tray.

Horrors!


5 posted on 04/06/2017 6:48:39 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Only 149% ,they’re slipping


6 posted on 04/06/2017 6:48:48 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I had it pegged at 151%, so this report actually comes as a huge relief to me.


7 posted on 04/06/2017 6:48:53 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

These idiots still have nothing to back up this hoax, so it’s on to more scare tactics! What better than to scare people at 33,000 Ft., especially those who are already uncomfortable flying!

I loathe these people!


8 posted on 04/06/2017 6:50:21 AM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s the specificity that tells you it’s bogus.


9 posted on 04/06/2017 6:50:23 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("In a Time of Universal Deceit Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I refuse to give CNBC the click, so I doubt I’ll see the whole story.

One question, though. Does the study or the article give a baseline number for “severe turbulence” incidents? Is it 5, 50, 500? If the baseline is 5 for example, 150% of that would be 7 or 8, not a real significant uptick, IMHO. Unless you belong to the church of Algore, I suppose.


10 posted on 04/06/2017 6:52:43 AM PDT by ssaftler (Proud member of the "Alt-Right". Whatever the heck that is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How does turbulence matter?

I have it on good authority that the seas rose up last year and drowned us all because of global warming.


12 posted on 04/06/2017 6:53:22 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This is long past ridiculous.

No point in giving the N reasons (where N is a large number) why this is a bunch of bull Obama.

Really, folks, the ONLY place you’ll see this type of “research” is as an output of government sponsored “research”. You don’t say what is wanted, no bucks.

Below is a short list. There is much more, for those willing to look. That is, until GOOGLE decides to eliminate these refs.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/02/13/peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scientists-skeptical-of-global-warming-crisis/#2a785fb14c7c

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming


13 posted on 04/06/2017 6:54:16 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That’s still nothing compared to being molested by TSA.


14 posted on 04/06/2017 6:54:18 AM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And even worse, its only now THREE out of FIVE dentists recommend Dentyne

Because we are all gonna die!


15 posted on 04/06/2017 6:54:30 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Apparently, England is still hungry for money and are a little behind the times in that rat race for government dollars. Letting that sh!t bleed over here to this country is another big, big mistake. It is all about the $$. Nothing more.


17 posted on 04/06/2017 6:55:21 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
at the prospect of a 149% increase in severe turbulence

Rather precise number, based on junk science. They cannot get the weather right next month.

19 posted on 04/06/2017 6:56:48 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

A few hundred billion, confiscated by various Western governments from the Middle Class and given to Leftist universities, can bring that turbulence down to 110%. The supercomputers are never incorrect, you know.


20 posted on 04/06/2017 6:57:34 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

my computer model says that the turbulence increase will be from all the mile high club inductions occurring due to global warming...

don’t they have radar to detect severe turbulence conditions...


21 posted on 04/06/2017 6:58:56 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“could”


22 posted on 04/06/2017 6:59:18 AM PDT by David in Cal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“:Climate change could increase severe turbulence by 149 percent, study says”

149? Not 150? Must be TRUE because they are so precise. NOT!


25 posted on 04/06/2017 7:02:53 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

or not


26 posted on 04/06/2017 7:03:09 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson