I refuse to give CNBC the click, so I doubt I’ll see the whole story.
One question, though. Does the study or the article give a baseline number for “severe turbulence” incidents? Is it 5, 50, 500? If the baseline is 5 for example, 150% of that would be 7 or 8, not a real significant uptick, IMHO. Unless you belong to the church of Algore, I suppose.
An average of the speculation of range of WAGs by fund-starved researchers.
In this day and age, there simply isn’t enough money or time in that industry to justify long term legitimate work or ‘research’....just more rehashed speculative crap about rehashed speculative, unsupported ‘data’ that are questionable at best. The end goal STILL being, “The Quest for the Inexhaustible Funds.”