Article and #14
Posted on 04/05/2017 7:57:08 PM PDT by markomalley
NOTE:
This is a 40 page PDF: obviously too big to post here.
Conclusions from the article:
Conclusions
- Historically, incumbent Presidents order espionage (to include eavesdropping) against the candidate of the party that opposes them.
- This election linked espionage may include illegal eavesdropping from one political party against the other party, or it may involve espionage inside the respective parties.
- Historically, the NSA has been used for this sort of eavesdropping, but other agencies may be involved as well.
- It would have been astoundingly unusual for President Obama not to order the eavesdropping of Candidate Trump, or Candidate Sanders.
- The NSA has a partnership agreement with the intelligence services of four other nations, to include the British GCHQ through the Five Eyes partnership.6)By performing a “Reach Around” the NSA can provide GCHQ with access to the private communications of a Presidential candidate, so that GCHQ writes up the information contained in the intercept, which GCHQ then leaks through various deniable sources to the media in order to control U.S. elections.
- President Trump has a legitimate claim that the NSA eavesdropped on him during the Presidential campaign of 2016.
- President Trump has a legitimate claim that the NSA routed signals out of Trump Tower to GCHQ, who were an integral mechanism to attempt to manipulate the U.S. Elections.
- President Trump claims that President Obama had his wires tapped are legitimate, credible, and viable.
- It is highly probable that President Obama did in fact violated the Fourth Amendment and attempted to sabotage the Presidential Campaign of Donald Trump by using the NSA and its various eavesdropping programs.
>> It is highly probable that President Obama did in fact violated ...
That jackass violated my families health resources and wellbeing. “He’s dirty...”
Trumps tweet was 100% correct!! VINDICATED TOTALLY. ( they look so stupid in criticizing him)
Obama is Putin
It is a good read and i’m at page seven. real privacy only will occur when i have the option of optimal delivery. sans any other feature. that would be pennies. all the money we pay for phones is for saving the data.
I certainly hope that Barak Hussein has a substantial reason to be staying out of the country.
Notice not one MSM outlet is saying a word about Obama. The guy disappears to the south Pacific for weeks and not a word!!. You can’t tell me he didn’t know this crap with Rice was coming down and a shitstorm would be all around him.
The MSM is hiding and covering for him; that’s how we know there is legs to these stories about wiretapping.
10) It is highly probable that President Obama did in fact violated the Fourth Amendment and attempted to sabotage the Presidential Campaign of Donald Trump by using the NSA and its various eavesdropping programs.
8) President Trump has a legitimate claim that the NSA routed signals out of Trump Tower to GCHQ, who were an integral mechanism to attempt to manipulate the U.S. Elections.
So Obama did the same thing that the Dems and Rino’s are accusing Trump of doing!! I think Trump has them dead to rights and is slowly burning them in front of the American public...that’s why his tweets are getting bolder...he’s got the goods.
Markomalley...you should post this in the AM under NEWS...it’s a great read and I’m sure most people won’t see it tonight.
Thanks for posting this!
interesting
Since the rats are backed into a corner, we’ll soon hear no end of:
<>Historically, incumbent Presidents order espionage (to include eavesdropping) against the candidate of the party that opposes them.<>
The “everybody does it defense” will get Rice and Obama off the hook.
Bump for later . . .
bttt
Read pages 13 and following.
The biggest problem with the Obama Administration is that they were utterly blatant about doing the surveillance and that their leaks to the press were equally blatant.
But, with the exception of Reagan (who was orders of magnitude better than the others), there weren't any innocent players. It's called the "Deep State" and the "Uniparty" for a reason.
Detailed evaluation of espionage !
I notice this part also:
“...Historically, incumbent Presidents order espionage (to include eavesdropping) against the candidate of the party that opposes them. ...”
The “everybody does it defense” may not work this time; people are fed up with left-wing ideologists such as Rice & O.
Article and #14
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.