Posted on 04/05/2017 8:43:16 AM PDT by C19fan
Who said this?
“a rational mind should exclude the injection of their names into the subject as causing a distraction.”
Insofar as NSC matter yes. There is ZERO evidence of any connection with the news that Bannon is no longer needed in the NCS.
Bannon, himself made a statement today clarifying the situation. This entire matter is a big NOTHING.
Yet, people squawk about Kushners and Gorelick in relation to Bannon.
There is no there there in their relationship and roles.
If you want to chatter about Kushners and Gorelick, do it on another thread. It has no place here.
Do I think Jared Kushner is not taking a risk in having a close client relationship with Gorelick? Not only do I think there is a big risk but I have posted about it several times ON OTHER THREADS where it was related.
For example, one thread that I posted to inform/remind Freepers about Gorelick was entitled ‘Gorelick’s Wall’ which described how what she did led to 9-11.
But it doesn’t belong here.
Trump was not ALWAYS liberal; he was ALWAYS a businessman which is why he was elected. I just read about McMaster’s book, “Dereliction of Duty,” and from his point of view, and probably mine (I now have the book on my to-do list), Bannon needs to use his excellent talents elsewhere. This is not a failure. Trump is loyal and Bannon is loyal. We’ll see what plans there are for him.
take a look at his posting history and you’ll wonder why he’s here instead of at some Glenn Beck fanboy site
The Trump party is over from the Ivanka and Jared angle. Their ‘feelings’ overwhelm any thought. They are anti conservative, bait and switch. They are likely future Democrat opposition.
Why do you believe an asinine statement like that?
You are soooo confused. Read the article. But some tin foil
Thanks for the info silverleaf
“Yet, people squawk about Kushners and Gorelick in relation to Bannon ... “ Not me
Trying to bully me into having you direct what I post about and where isn’t going to work, so bug off from that direction.
“But it [gorlick stuff]doesn’t belong here”
Then stop talkig about it.
If I talk about Gorlick, it belongs here.
I will post what I feel necessary and relevant even if you disagree.
Here’s another source - Jack Posobiec for Rebel Media:
https://www.pscp.tv/JackPosobiec/1YqJDXeNkOkJV?t=17
Sorry you don’t seem to get it Roger and Alex are not legit sources
If I may expand. The three levels are TS, Secret, and Confidential. Documents are most definitely labeled at those levels. Each can have many additional caveats for additional restrictions such as NOFORN or FVEY (Five Eyes). Then there is the whole world of SCI and Special Access Programs that you need to be read in on beyond collateral clearance.
Troll.
You are the one who should “but” the tin foil. : )
Some people are going insane and swallowing disinfo from lying Fake News as though it was life giving elixir.
My mistake, then, having never viewed actual secured documents. I have a mere NAIC clearance, one below Public Trust.
But, please correct / confirm: Documents are attached to “projects” (or whatever the right term is), and that entity will often have a code name and a clearance level in and of its own? And that a person’s clearance level is independent of that, and match or exceed the “projects”? And additionally, all documents under that umbrella are viewable only on need-to-know basis?
It’s been 25 years since I looked at these, so they may well have then said “Classified/NOFORN” but I never saw a document marked “Secret” even though the program was “classified.”
No kidding
Then the program was probably at the Classified level. No need for documents marked higher than that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.