Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Kinda sounds like she needs to get her mind right. Still makes me wonder - where did she learn this garbage?
1 posted on 04/02/2017 2:51:58 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

These black robes have come to use the law (from wherever it comes) as an ala carte menu. Pick one from column A and so on.

The reason for this is that these principled poltroons don’t like having to apply the most basic fundamentals of freedom and fairness ever conceived as a governing document. The duplicity of this is astounding because in the very outset of their lying, self-deluding careers they AGREED by word and deed to uphold the very tenets they now throw away.

Disgusting examples of the level to which something formerly human can devolve. Almost as bad as journalists.


2 posted on 04/02/2017 3:00:01 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Using her logic...we don’t need judges anymore. There are no laws to enforce, because you just don’t recognize laws. I like where this is going. Wide-open range. You could arrange for some newly arrived Albanian refugee to be the next chief justice, and his previous occupation was bus-driver.


3 posted on 04/02/2017 3:04:04 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFCM6TZgTMI


6 posted on 04/02/2017 3:53:09 AM PDT by RonnG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

A judge who is an anarchist? Well they will receive a little anarchy. Served up with sang froid!


7 posted on 04/02/2017 3:59:01 AM PDT by Candor7 ((Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"Tani Cantil-Sakauye ?" I've noticed that none of these "judges" raising havoc are members of the D.A.R.
8 posted on 04/02/2017 4:10:30 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Since 1870 Congress imposed UnNaturalization Acts.


9 posted on 04/02/2017 4:49:05 AM PDT by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Inside the twisted mind of America’s robed totalitarians.


10 posted on 04/02/2017 4:59:38 AM PDT by PGalt (Freeman is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The hyphen told me all I needed to know.


11 posted on 04/02/2017 5:01:53 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Drain the swamp. Build the wall. Open the Pizzagate. I refuse to inhabit any safe space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Sounds good. Let’s apply it for firearms, too.
All state gun control laws are illegal because they’re against the laws of America.


12 posted on 04/02/2017 5:05:13 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Vote for your guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Has she entered any orders on the subject? I didn’t think so. So we can ignore her.


14 posted on 04/02/2017 5:23:56 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

This creepozoid is just like Obambi. Obambi once stated “the Constitution is a list negative rights.” To them the law is what I ‘feel’ the law is today, this minute. Tomorrow, or later this afternoon, the law can be something else, depending on how I ‘feel.’ Creepozoids all.


15 posted on 04/02/2017 5:34:41 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye”

Judge Cantelope-Sukiyaki’s reasoning is about as mixed up as her name, /S


16 posted on 04/02/2017 6:06:17 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

CA lawyers evidently have never had a law course, have they?

They are rapidly reaping the benefits of a new and upcoming third world country,


17 posted on 04/02/2017 6:21:44 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

What I don’t understand is this : If California can have its own immigration rules and enforcement ... separate from the Federal government ... why can’t other States do the same? For example, why can’t some states have stricter immigration rules and enforcement?


18 posted on 04/02/2017 7:24:09 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Enforcing Immigration Laws Goes Against The Rule Of Law

Where exactly did this person go to Law School, and how did they get admitted to the Bar?

19 posted on 04/02/2017 7:34:16 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Spend all their time feelin' sorry for themselves Victim of this, victim of that ... Get Over It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

See what Obama has caused? He would not enforce the law either. He started this crap.


25 posted on 04/02/2017 12:44:55 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent (EEe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Doesn’t saying that in public offer legal grounds to remove it from the bench legally?


29 posted on 04/02/2017 2:16:57 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson