Posted on 04/02/2017 2:51:58 AM PDT by Libloather
These black robes have come to use the law (from wherever it comes) as an ala carte menu. Pick one from column A and so on.
The reason for this is that these principled poltroons don’t like having to apply the most basic fundamentals of freedom and fairness ever conceived as a governing document. The duplicity of this is astounding because in the very outset of their lying, self-deluding careers they AGREED by word and deed to uphold the very tenets they now throw away.
Disgusting examples of the level to which something formerly human can devolve. Almost as bad as journalists.
Using her logic...we don’t need judges anymore. There are no laws to enforce, because you just don’t recognize laws. I like where this is going. Wide-open range. You could arrange for some newly arrived Albanian refugee to be the next chief justice, and his previous occupation was bus-driver.
>Using her logic...we don’t need judges anymore. There are no laws to enforce, because you just don’t recognize laws.
Interesting stuff.
Welcome to the Obamanation? We’ve long known what this is (12/23/2008):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2153351/posts
To: Republic of Texas
Naaaah! Welcome to New Kenya (Africa U.S.A.)
“Where the law of the jungle has replaced the Law of the Land.”
—
de Texas Fossil
37 posted on 12/23/2008 1:13:26 PM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
A judge who is an anarchist? Well they will receive a little anarchy. Served up with sang froid!
Since 1870 Congress imposed UnNaturalization Acts.
Inside the twisted mind of America’s robed totalitarians.
The hyphen told me all I needed to know.
Sounds good. Let’s apply it for firearms, too.
All state gun control laws are illegal because they’re against the laws of America.
Judge as defined in a common dictionary is: A public official with authority to hear and decide cases in a court of law. A person designated to determine the winner, settle a controversy, etc
Has she entered any orders on the subject? I didn’t think so. So we can ignore her.
This creepozoid is just like Obambi. Obambi once stated “the Constitution is a list negative rights.” To them the law is what I ‘feel’ the law is today, this minute. Tomorrow, or later this afternoon, the law can be something else, depending on how I ‘feel.’ Creepozoids all.
“Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye”
Judge Cantelope-Sukiyaki’s reasoning is about as mixed up as her name, /S
CA lawyers evidently have never had a law course, have they?
They are rapidly reaping the benefits of a new and upcoming third world country,
What I don’t understand is this : If California can have its own immigration rules and enforcement ... separate from the Federal government ... why can’t other States do the same? For example, why can’t some states have stricter immigration rules and enforcement?
Where exactly did this person go to Law School, and how did they get admitted to the Bar?
You have to ask??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.