Posted on 03/29/2017 12:28:10 PM PDT by SandRat
PHOENIX Got one of those plastic covers or films over your license plate?
Be prepared to get out your screwdriver or razor blade to take it off.
Gov. Doug Ducey on Tuesday signed legislation making it illegal to put any covering or substance on a plate "that obscures from any angle the number, characters, year validating tabs or name of the jurisdiction issuing the plate.'' The measure takes effect 90 days after the end of the session, meaning probably not until sometime in August.
Violators would be subject to civil fines decided by a judge.
The issue has been at the heart of the debate now for more than a decade over the issue of photo radar.
That's because many of these coverings are deliberately designed to keep the plates of offending vehicles from being clearly photographed. And foes of the practice sought to keep the plate coverings legal to defeat the cameras.
Prior efforts by other lawmakers went down to defeat in 2004, 2008 and 2010.
But that issue of photo radar did not arise at the hearings this year. Instead, Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, said what's behind his legislation are concerns that bad guys will get away because police officers and witnesses to crimes won't be able to read the license of the vehicle.
He noted that SB 1073 has the backing of several different organizations of police officers. And Farley said this has nothing to do with whether cameras can catch speeders and those who run red lights.
"The problem is that these things don't just hide the photo radar flashes,'' he said. "They hide low-angle sun as well.''
Farley said that should be obvious to anyone who commutes early or late in the day and tries to read the license plate of the vehicle in front.
"The ones that have these coverings on them, you can't read them at all,'' he said. And that, said Farley, has gotten the attention of police officers and sheriff's deputies.
"If we're going to require license plates at all in order to identify the cars to law enforcement and witnesses at crimes, we should make sure they're not obscured,'' he said. "Otherwise we're giving an unfair advantage to criminals.''
The big surprise to some lawmakers was the need for the bill.
"I thought it was already illegal,'' Sen. Karen Fann, R-Prescott, said during a hearing on the legislation. She wasn't the only one.
"Then why did I get a ticket for it?'' piped up Sen. Kate Brophy McGee, R-Phoenix.
Sen. Bob Worsley, R-Mesa, who chairs the Senate Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, responded he was at a loss to explain.
"Some visionary cop gave you a ticket that's not legal yet,'' he quipped.
"It was so embarrassing,'' Brophy McGee responded.
The senator did not recall the specifics of the citation. But there already is a law that motorists "shall maintain each license plate to it is clearly legible.''
That language clearly deals with situations where the plate is not visible from any angle. This new law covers instances where the question of visibility may depend on from where it is being viewed
One thing I’ve seen are plate covers that absorb infrared. The cops like aiming their lasers at the front plate because it is big, flat and reflective. If they get no reading it might be too late to reaim before you’re past them.
You might check with a local attorney before you waste any more time or money. Good luck.
“youre looking at maybe thirty dollars a plate if personalized.”
That’s peanuts compared to Ohio! A personalized plate renewal fee is over 100 bucks a year! Renewal of a regular plate is something like 34 bucks.
>
Any criminal planning a large-scale heist is going to visit a shopping mall and exchange plates with another vehicle of similar make and model. They are only meaningful among law-abiding people in all reality.
>
They are ONLY meaningful to the ever-$$-hungry GOVT.
It’s thirty dollars for the plate plus registration which like Ohio comes to almost a hundred. Veterans are not cut any slack on any veteran promotions WA does.
go here per haps? http://www.photoblocker.com/
Myth Busters already busted that crapmyth.........
IIRC, the reason that they blur the passenger was because someone got the photo ticket where the passenger was not his wife...
No, but they have strict rules about them. They can’t obscure the state name even slightly, which is typically between the top mounting holes, so the frame end up having to be pretty minimal. Stupid law if you ask me, because half the states write the state name in some God-awful trendy font that you can’t read anyway. But we dare not obscure it, even partly, because the cops want to be unable to read it because of the font, not because of the frame.
He’s full of crap about the obscuring issue, but I agree that being from a remote county is neither probable cause nor RAS.
Groucho’s gonna be in court a lot!
This is a great law. I wish Pennsylvania would do the same thing. I have seen plastic coverings which obscured the plate so badly that it could not be read from 10 feet away and the cops ignore it here in Pennsylvania. There is no viable reason for those covers and also the plate covers that obscure the state name and other information.
Everyone here is approaching issue incorrectly- if the problem is the camera, necktie the camera
Not the "Do Not Remove" tag!
Yeah, they did that in Florida a while back. It is the only reason I’ve been pulled over before.
Not the “Do Not Remove” tag!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.