Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House looks past conservatives on tax reform - to Democrats
Reuters ^ | March 26th, 2017 | By Lindsay Dunsmuir and Doina Chiacu

Posted on 03/26/2017 1:11:20 PM PDT by Mariner

Fresh off a defeat on U.S. healthcare legislation, the White House warned rebellious conservative lawmakers that they should get behind President Donald Trump's agenda or he may bypass them on future legislative fights, including tax reform.

The threat by White House chief of staff Reince Priebus to build a broad coalition on tax reform that could include moderate Democrats came as the Republican head of the tax-writing committee in the House of Representatives said he hoped to move a tax bill through his panel this spring.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady said his committee had been working on tax reform in parallel with the failed healthcare reform push.

"We've never stopped working," Brady told Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo." "We will continue to make improvements."

Brady said the committee plans to move on the bill in the spring. He said he wanted the House blueprint to be the basis for Trump's tax reform plan rather than have competing versions from Treasury and the White House.

Both Trump and Priebus have scolded hardline conservatives who rejected legislation backed by the White House to overhaul Obamacare.

Speaking on "Fox News Sunday," Priebus held out the possibility of working with moderate Democrats as well as Republicans to pass other aspects of Trump's agenda, such as his proposed budget, the revamp of the tax code and a renewed effort at healthcare reform.

"If we can come up with a bill that accomplishes the goals of the president with Republicans alone, we'll take it and we'll move forward with it," Priebus said.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: albertaschild; bs; fakenews; freedomcaucusblock; goodgoing; lol; pearlclutchers; popcorn; reuters; roooters; snowflakes; suckitupbuttercups; taxreform; trumpdemocrats; trumpdems; trumptaxreform; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-290 next last
To: VAFreedom

Because the Republican party does not want to repeal Obamacare without putting something very much like it in its place.

Now that they’ve caught the care, they are afraid of it.


181 posted on 03/26/2017 4:22:51 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

“Rather than accept Ryancare warts and all and live to fight another day they chose to be arsonists.”

Please stop that BS.

FC just saved Trump his presidency by denying the Ryancare’s morphing into Trumpcare.

If Trump starts aligning himself with the Democrats in Taxes, then there isn’t ANYONE that can save it.

Mr. President, please don’t preside over a failed presidency — listen to FC concerns rather than threatening to move to the left. Republicans control both houses and the WH. In a few months, USSC is going to be conservative, as well. Don’t squander this once in a century opportunity.


182 posted on 03/26/2017 4:25:20 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

amen brother.


183 posted on 03/26/2017 4:27:59 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

I think his daughter and son in law are liberal poison.


184 posted on 03/26/2017 4:30:59 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom
A repeal only bill passed on 1/08/2016 and ended up on Obama’s desk... and of course we know what happened. why couldn’t one end up on Trump’s desk now that we own 3 branches. someone doesn’t want it to go all the way.

Trump didn't want repeal only. He campaigned on giving people better coverage at a lower cost. (Probably impossible to do, but that's what he campaigned on.)

185 posted on 03/26/2017 4:35:10 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: dangus

“were SO nasty towards Ted Cruz supporters can appreciate now what our concerns are. “

There is no point in opening the old wounds.

The primary is over, the election is over. Now is time to govern as conservatives with REPEAL, Tax Cuts, and law and order enforcements.


186 posted on 03/26/2017 4:35:39 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: All

Well, hell, some of my most scintillating prose was in that other locked thread.

I’ll offer up just a tidbit.

Y’all do know a Continuing Resolution has to pass fairly soon (not to mention the Debt Ceiling increase end of April) and guess what’s in the CR. By definition a continuation of current funding for all budget items.

That means Obamacare, and its juicy funding for healthcare for illegals.

The FC is gonna have to vote for that, because no Dems will vote for anything whatsoever Trump wants.

That will be interesting, yes?

All this talk of pivoting to tax reform is mostly coming out of Wall Street, who are desperate for stimulus. Pretty silly. I suspect they’ll bog down for weeks or months on the debt ceiling and CR. Tax Reform will get zero attention as soon as the pressures build.


187 posted on 03/26/2017 4:38:57 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: 198ml

Well...as I see it, he’s forcing the Dems to either “reveal their position” (i.e. identify themselves) or let it become obvious that there are none.


188 posted on 03/26/2017 4:39:05 PM PDT by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Trump is a brilliant strategist.

“Hey Republicans, don’t want to play with me? There are others ya know.”

Shame sometimes works.


189 posted on 03/26/2017 4:43:15 PM PDT by upchuck (U have not lived today until u have done something for someone who can never repay u ~ John Bunyan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
With Democrats in a hard spot in 2018 they might easily work with Trump to save their hides.

Don't you see the great irony in that?

The Democrats might win House seats in 2018 -- maybe even enough to get a majority. But the seats they are most likely to win aren't the Freedom Caucus seats ... they're the seats of the moderate "Tuesday Group" Republicans who were opposed to Ryan's bill.

So why all the anger against the Freedom Caucus members, instead of the Tuesday Group members?

190 posted on 03/26/2017 4:50:02 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

“Trump didn’t want repeal only. He campaigned on giving people better coverage at a lower cost. (Probably impossible to do, but that’s what he campaigned on.)”

I understand that, but I imagine that they could just say let’s pass the repeal bill first and then do the replacement later? (probably impossible to do too)


191 posted on 03/26/2017 4:50:23 PM PDT by VAFreedom (maybe i should take a nap before work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: hollyweed

The legislation that POTUS wanted to pass would have increased premiums, increased the deficit and eliminated coverage for 15 million people. This is what you voted for? Trump needs to get with the conservative agenda.... fast.


The bill would have given us a lot of important things we wanted. Now we get NOTHING. And eventually we get a rub salt in the wounds “clean” obamacare fix that will make road kill of the freedom caucus.

Why is this so hard? Democrats are literally dancing in the streets at torpedoing the first major item on POTUS’s agenda. Buy a clue. We’ve got to stick together behind POTUS or it’s all over. The wall, trade, everything. Over. It’s that simple.


192 posted on 03/26/2017 4:52:10 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom
"So now, why isn’t there just a repeal bill sitting on Trump’s desk?"

Because now its for real and the specter of 20 million people losing their healthcare is a political death wish.

Rather than negotiate w/ Trump the FC decided to play hardball and humiliate him. Now the press and the progressives are licking their chops.

There's blood in the water.

The entire movement hangs by a thread. I've been coming to FR for 20 years or so and we have never had the complete toolbox.

Now that we do it appears we are bound and determined to self-incinerate.

Please put down the matches.

193 posted on 03/26/2017 4:52:56 PM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

And how did standing true work for everyone? We still have Obamacare!!


194 posted on 03/26/2017 4:54:06 PM PDT by lionstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Mr. President, please don’t preside over a failed presidency — listen to FC concerns rather than threatening to move to the left. Republicans control both houses and the WH. In a few months, USSC is going to be conservative, as well. Don’t squander this once in a century opportunity.


Yep. USSC can be conservative thanks to Trump. Not thanks to the arsonists in the freedom caucus. How’s that freedom caucus obamacare repeal and replace going? Got a whip count for me? “You break it you own it” comes to mind here, FRiend.


195 posted on 03/26/2017 4:56:43 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

None of it makes any sense at all. Trumps actions the past couple weeks make no sense at all.


196 posted on 03/26/2017 4:58:58 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eartick
Trumpcare was what President Trump wanted ...

No, it wasn't. President Trump wanted it because that was the bill that was cobbled together by the House leadership. If the bill repealed Obamacare and replaced with a single-payer system he would have supported it. If the bill repealed Obamacare and replaced it with another bill that was identical to Obamacare he would have supported it. If the bill required everyone in the U.S. to get a lobotomy he would have supported it. He's been all over the map on this issue and got himself involved in a process that was completely out of his control.

If Trump really wanted that bill then I would ask two questions:

1. Why didn't he make a single nationally televised appeal to lay out the terms of the bill and explain to Americans why it was a good idea?

2. Why would he ever accept a rushed, half-assed process with an artificial deadline set by Paul Ryan that was only established so it would coincide with the anniversary of the original Obamacare legislation? Trump probably spent more time figuring out the paint color schemes for Trump Tower than he spent working on a this bill.

197 posted on 03/26/2017 4:59:06 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“No, I don’t advocate that. I’m close to the anarchy side of (l)ibertarian. I would burn the entirety of DC to the ground. But I also recognize political reality.”

Fair enough, Mariner. I misconstrued your post. But I think passing a market based replacement bill is a reality if Trump would get behind it and someone other than Ryan was the spokesman for it.

The Dims would have hung RyanCare (TrumpCare, ObummerCare 2.0, whatever) around the Republicans necks for several election cycles because it was doomed to be a failure at reducing premium costs.


198 posted on 03/26/2017 4:59:21 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
He also believes strongly in the safety net and is very unlikely to reduce funding for those programs.

Maybe he is a "compassionate conservative".

199 posted on 03/26/2017 4:59:30 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angelrod
At least with this version, PP would have been gone.

That is 100% false. No House bill that defunded Planned Parenthood would ever survive a Democrat filibuster in the Senate.

I'll go one step further ...

No House bill that defunded Planned Parenthood would even get 50 REPUBLICAN votes in the Senate.

That whole "defund Planned Parenthood" thing was just a political canard.

200 posted on 03/26/2017 5:02:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson