Posted on 03/07/2017 10:04:11 AM PST by PJ-Comix
You have probably seen the image below of the New York Times January 20 headline. It has gone viral on web and renders absurd the current denials by the Times and much of the rest of the mainstream media that there was no wiretapping of the Donald Trump campaign by the Obama administration. No, there won't be a document out there signed by former President Obama that says something like "I hereby authorize the wiretapping of the Trump campaign." There doesn't need to be. The headline and its January 19 article makes very clear that the previous administration did secretly monitor communications of the Trump campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
I'm beginning to believe stories about an alternate universe. This is lunacy.
-PJ
The issue is whether there was probable cause to issue a warrant. Probable cause is the reasonable likelihood that a crime is or has been committed by the person or at the place designated. So far it doesn't look like it to me. Obama never produced one scrap of evidence. Only allegations and accusations.
If there was no probable cause, the warrant was illegally issued and the wiretapping was illegal.
OMG all I have to say, unfrigging believeable!!!
So what’s the problem?
“I was for the war before I was against it.”
“There was wire-tapping at the same time there wasn’t.”
“Maestro, we can’t tell if you want us to go slower or faster.” “I want you to do both.”
No problemo.
Here is today’s front page of the NYT: https://archive.is/wyv38/a928e02d512fd63d5b561831235bedca420aff4d.jpg
“Wiretapping claims puncture veneer of presidential civility.”
RummyChick I have to say our POTUS has a spine of steel!!! He didn’t need this DAMNED JOB, and what he is WILLING to do to give us our country and government back is TRULY REMARKABLE!!! I pray for his safety HOWEVER I believe this election WAS a divine intervention so I believe the hand of God is on him, to think the intel community has been able to take over the rule of this country is ASTOUNDING!!! To think we WON this election KNOWING THIS NOW is even MORE ASTOUNDING!!!!
Two words....James Rosen
“Wiretapping claims puncture veneer of presidential civility.”
WOW! What clueless amoral wipes they are..
So lets review..
A prez wiretapping political opponets = Civil.
A prez calling the other prez out = UNCIVIL.
If a IS citizen is collateral the agencies have to get permission and a warrant to unblock the citizens name
True words well said
“And now one of that article’s authors says, “Naw, no proof.” Was he lying then or is he lying now?”
This is now the time to brig the author in and get his two sources. Because he is either lying in which case he violated any ethics guidelines and needs to be immediately fired, or he colluded with a third party and there needs to be a criminal investigation and someone is going to jail.
I hope that the President ,who has been a victim here, will convene a study commission tasked to the punishments and statutes necessary to destroy this entire illegal unconstitutional madness.
I just sent this to Breitbart.
They have a “Send us a tip” link at the very bottom right of their main page.
I think anything published on Breitbart has a good chance of being read by Trump.
Russian Caviar – from $30.29
“Was he lying then or is he lying now?”
NYT: Is your headline true, or was it just #FakeNews?
“Nobody is madder that I am...”
(Next words out of Obammy’s mouth)
#13-What about Trump’s phone conversations with the Australian and Mexican presidents? How do they explain those transcripts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
