Posted on 03/07/2017 6:59:35 AM PST by TigerClaws
That is actually much more feasible than taking control of an automobile, since all commercial aircraft have remote flight control systems designed to let the tower take over the final descent portion.
I understand what you are saying, but if I’m not mistaken, there are some vehicles that do use some sort of remote connecting for starting the engine. I really don’t know enough about the systems Mercedes uses to say one way or another if it could’ve been done. It would be likely that the computer systems being used on higher end vehicles would have some sort of wifi connection for use with diagnostic machines, but perhaps it’s still a hard wired process.
Not the ones who claimed that Ninja Frogmen offed Fuddy and
then turned her into a mannequin so she would fit into a smaller coffin.
Those kooks are far beyond vindication.
IIRC on a Boeing aircraft the pilot can override the automatic system and manually fly the aircraft.
You are way behind the times, don’t even know what’s already been shown.
Sad.
Did I miss the part about the underwater mechanic shop that swapped the engine?
Yeah. I suppose you think those dozens of mis-matched cuts on the engine came from one engine rolling around in the water.
And I suppose you believe that an intense fire destroyed the engine that was in that plane (as claimed by the NTSB and Pratt & Whitney based on the engine they were given to examine), even though the pilot is seen feeding more fuel into the engine which is an absolute no-no if there’s a fire, and the engine on the video is seen/heard through audio analysis to be running normally until about a second after splashdown (when water filled the engine) and the gauge shows a fuel delivery rate consistent with those other two clues on the video - all showing that there was no engine failure but a normally-running engine right up to splashdown.
Oh well. I can’t make you see what you refuse to see. Just like the folks who said it was crazy that the opposition’s computers were hacked and all the other stuff that the CIA has been doing all along. Those who have seen it first-hand knew it was going on, but those on the sidelines had the luxury of laughing at us because they either weren’t engaged enough to be a threat to the regime or were covertly part of the regime.
The “cool kids” were “embarrassed” by those who are now shown to have been speaking the truth on the CIA crap, and the Fuddy hoax won’t be far behind. All in the right time.
Yes, I’m sure you read all about it on the internet.
I was engaged enough to be a threat to the regime, even with the mistakes I made - which should tell everybody how serious they know this is.
Not that my role matters, except for the price I and my family are paying now.
“Zola”, if you’re listening, I would STILL rather my family live free - even poisoned to the point that they can’t remember what the mechanic told them 15 minutes earlier - than watch them suffer in the lawless world that you and your criminal bosses have been trying to push on America. You will be found out - if not in this life then in the next. I hope you and your fellow henchmen repent for what you did to us in order to silence the truth, because God is not amused.
I sure would hope so.
I did a little research, my recollection was correct except for 777 and 787 which are “fly by wire” (FBW). I’m not sure how exactly a FBW and an autopilot system interact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.