The same press that denies all of this is the same press that told us it was true, back when they thought it hurt Trump to say so. Now that they think it helps Trump, it goes down the memory hole.
So Obama needs an excuse to get a warrant to tap Trump. So he states he has evidence that Trump is colluding with Russians to get the warrant or something along those lines. The warrant is granted. Nobody believes Donald Trump will win. It is believed that Hillary will win and retain the levers of power and Donald Trump will never even find out what happened. But Donald Trump wins and they know he’s going to find out that he was wiretapped. they immediately move to cover their asses by creating the fiction that Donald Trump was in cahoots with the Russians so that when it all inevitably comes out, they can say, this is why we did it. The Russia conspiracy theory is Obama’s cover story for tapping Donald Trump.
President Trump did not say that a FISA Court ordered a wiretap, he said that Obama wiretapped.
Therefore, there was no court order and the wiretaps were illegal.
This is why I have been very lukewarm (even against) to the Patriot Act. FISA has been used, abused and misused.
It is nothing more than a rubber stamp for intel and politicos, especially with their Democrat appeals court.
Which again makes the MSM fake news. They reported it as a fact that President Trump was lying, that he was a conspiracy theorist, etc.
So I guess it isn’t “alleged wiretapping” any more.
considering the fisa court never denies a warrant (they would indict a ham sandwich) the original request must be very damning to have failed.
Notice how the Fake Stream Media colludes and all of them say the same thing. Namely, Trump PROVIDED NO EVIDENCE that he was wire tapped at Trump Tower.
The same Fake Stream Media colluded and all of them said the same thing, Trump PROVIDED NO EVIDENCE when he claimed there were millions of illegal voters.
I am beginning to see a pattern.
Trump didn’t get where he is by being a dummy!
And Mark Levine, goes on Fox and Friends and proves that the FISA courts did get a warrnt. Here he is on YouTube... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fNfGjZdM0&feature=youtu.be
Take that, Barry. Turnabout is fair play.
By James Longstreet
Senator Schumer, do you disavow any knowledge of wiretappings of Trump offices?
Representative Pelosi, do you disavow any knowledge of wiretappings of Trump offices?
Wouldn’t we love to see the twisting, the facial expressions, the stammering from these two as their careers flash before their eyes as they search for the proper response?
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/03/take_that_barry_turnabout_is_fair_play.html
It is also possible Obama’s team may have perjured themselves before the FISA court by withholding material information essential to the FISA court’s willingness to permit the government surveillance.....since no wrongdoing was found.
This possibility would fall under the Crimes Act of 1958.
FALSIFYING GOVT DOCUMENTS---falsifying official documents is the criminal MO to hide larger crimes.
A person falsifying documents can be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years.
Also, if official government documents or govt authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. Legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting fact-based information
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.
Thanks for posting this:
It’s just one step past the unsealing of permanently sealed divorce records for polictical purposes.
“The spin has evolved from “Trump is talking crazy again” to “Trump has no proof” to “a wiretap was done without Obama’s knowledge” to “Obama had no choice but to investigate the treasonous Trump.” - Steve_Seattle
BTTT!
When they get to the rest of the story; they will find out that it was the Hillary campaign that was colluding with the Russians.
I bet it wasn’t only the Trump campaign that was wiretapped. I bet they wiretapped the Republican contenders that conventional wisdom had becoming the nominee. To be sure they probably wiretapped Sen. Ted Cruz.